The Obama administration has been trying to advance a gun confiscation agenda since it took office.First, let’s just get out of the way the real problem here so we can see clearly.
No authority has ever been given to the federal government to restrict any arms in any way. In fact, the Second Amendment is quite clear that “the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” That doesn’t mean a little bit and it doesn’t mean the federal government can lawfully ban citizens from any arms. It means when they do such things they are traitors to the Constitution and the people and are in violation of the law they are entrusted to uphold.
The ATF is an unconstitutional agency just like every other alphabet agency in the executive branch. They should not even be allowed to exist under law. the federal government has no authority restricting arms of any kind from American citizens per the Second Amendment, but he won’t do it. Therefore, our veterans are blacklisted by a criminal administration who seeks to disarm the populace TO ADVANCE a Marxist/zionist agenda.
THAT Marxist "agenda" CAUSED The Civil War, and UNIONIZED this "land", and the same "march" of ProgressivismMARXISM... NOW "seeks" to UNIONIZE (and annex) America to The World aka The New World Order....The Zionist Global AGENDA with its New Seat of Authority coming out Of Israell and Jerusalem. Thus We here in these STATES whereby MAJORITY are Christian Patriots with an AMERICAN NATIONAL "Identity" fueled by Christian IDEOLOGY...is being ursurped, disarmed, and looted..
You can not serve GLOBALIZATION and AMERICA "both"...for you can NOT serve FREEDOM and TYRANNY for they are OPPOSITES in "standard" and "ideology"...Oh MY PEOPLE Wake Up!
This Iran sanctions bill is a FARCE in that it WATERS down The Senate's CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. UNDER the constitution (and a "democratic" FORM of govt) the Senate REQUIRES 2/3 "majority" to APPROVE the treaty ......otherwise it fails.
Do you UNDERSTAND THE trickery AT PLAY HERE....(and I might add that THIS is the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of "the republican" FORM of govt Established in 1776 FOR "The People") ,
The bill REQUIRES 2/3 of the Senate to NOT APPROVE the treaty or it passes. If 1/3 + 1 of the senators DO NOT vote "against" the treaty it automatically passes. This is a dangerous errosion of the constitution which poses serious danger to the US, and the world....leading us to GLOBAL UNREST. For OUT OF CHAOS came be "birthed" THEIR AGENDA of a New World Order.
Create "the crisis", blame it on your enemies, provide a solution, get a Dictatorship...Oh Hail King Obama coming to a "manufactured" Crisis in America "soon".
Tyrannical governments never tell the truth, always blaming others for what they do. Stalin did it, some of our own presidents did it and life goes on for the sheeple.
For centuries, dictators have used “false flags” to tighten their control. It comes from the days of pirates and "nation states" that flew their enemy’s flags on ships to either get close enough to fire upon them or to blame their enemies for their own misdeeds, usually to justify going to war.
Here are a couple recent examples.
The picture below is that of the children supposedly the victims of Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting where 20-year-old Adam Lanza was alleged to have fatally shot 20 children on December 14, 2012.
Look closely at the photo in the first column on the left, the second row. That cute little boy is labeled “Noah.”
Now look at the picture next in line It is from the terrorist attack on the Army Public School in the northwestern Pakistani city of Peshawar on 16 December 2014, two years AFTER Sandy Hook, where 9 gunmen affiliated with the Taliban allegedly entered the school and opened fire on school staff and children, killing 145 people, including 132 schoolchildren, ranging between eight and eighteen years of age.
WHOSE PICTURE DO YOU SEE as a “Pakistani” child on the right? Noah. Same clothes, same smile – SAME FALSE FLAG.
There is a plan for the world - a New World Order - devised by an American/European financial elite of immense wealth and power with ancient historical roots, called by some the "Illuminati".
This oligarchy controls the politicians, the courts, the educational institutions, the food, the natural resources, the foreign policies, the economies and the money of most nations. And, they control the major media, which is why we know nothing about them.
Modern democracy (AFTER 1861) , as we know it, is less than 250 years old. For most of history, except for this brief period (AND OUR FOUNDING FATHERS UNDERSTOOD THIS and why this nation is so very important) , "The World" has been RULED by powerful elites who wielded absolute power OVER "their societies", CONTROLLED 'the wealth and resources" of their known world, and DOMNATED "their people" by FORCE.
The endgame will be a one-world government presiding over the earth for the BENEFITof "global oligarchs" and THEIR "superclass" FUNCTIONARIES, leaving "the mass of humanity" as SERFS, to "serve" The Elite, while suffering "poverty and misery" like under Pharoah in Egypt during the captivity of our people when Moses led them to freedom. We can ALL recall the words Let them eat cake....supposedly spoken by "a french great princess" upon learning that the peasants had no bread. Since brioche was made from dough enriched with butter and eggs, making it more expensive than bread, the quote reflected the princess's disregard for the peasants.
As we look at our "Representatives" in The House and The Congress, and Our President with his miraid of vacations all while The People are suffering, and the bankers get "bail-outs" I can hear that same voice of distain ringing through-out the White House.
Their plan includes scientifically engineered global population reduction (viruses/vaccines/genetically-modified food GMO's), cutting the world's population to less than one billion, leaving the earth's resources for the exclusive use of this global oligarchy.
Their plan includes scientifically engineered global population reduction (viruses/vaccines/genetically-modified food GMO's), cutting the world's population to less than one billion, leaving the earth's resources for the exclusive use of this global oligarchy.
If THE ZIONIST ORGANIZATION AMERICA (zoa) "praises" it....THEN IT CAN"T BE GOOD....because what BENEFITS Israel "over there" is DEFINATELY NOT A BENEFIT to "The HOUSE OF ISRAEL" over HERE. ! Wake Up! WE ARE ISRAEL! WE HAVE BEEN INFILTRATED FROM WITH AND THEY SIT IN THE SEAT OF MOSES MAKING OUR LAWS WHICH BENEFIT THEM AND STIP US OF OUR 1776 "reformed" HOUSE OF iSRAEL!
Iran (like Germany before World War) OUSTED the Rothchilds, Iran JUST a few days ago EXECUTED a Rothchild for BANKING FRAUD (google it). Iran is standing up against THE IDEA of USURY ....Let us not be "tricked" again by the vilification of that which is right, and make the mistake Of not recognizing OUR NATIONAL IDENTITY as American.
THEY "stage" False Flag ops TO INSTILL FEAR!!!!!!...
Sarah Bajc the girlfriend of the U.S. citizen aboard the Malaysian Airlines flight MH370, Phillip Wood. She received a lot of attention from all the major mainstream news stations.And we WERE ALL VERY DISTRACTED by this "staged" event.
I mention this as I truly believe that right here on American Soil with the recent strange Closing of 6 Wal-Mart coinciding with Janet Reno of Homeland Security thanking Wal-Mart and instructing OUR MINDS "control" to Report and "suspicious" activity whether IN Wal-Mart or in the Parking Lot.
I SMELL A BIG OLE RAT.
On April 27th 1961, John F. Kennedy gave a speech to the American Newspaper Publishers Association in the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York where he conveyed his heart felt desire to wage a war against secret societies. Two and a half years late he was dead at the age of 46. The courage to break from his heritage and fight for truth cost one of America's greatest ever presidents. Research over the last several decades clearly show foul play over his assassination in relation to major decisions he was making as a president which was opposite to the aims and ambitions of the global elite.
Who were the secret societies that Kennedy was referring to? The mainstream media will tell you it was the Soviet Union. However would the mainstream media ever admit to the fact that Kennedy was referring to something more dangerous and and sinister than communism? especially when the media OVERLORDS are controlled by a network of powerful families known as the Black Nobility....
The Black Nobility is the term used to describe a family lineage that predates even the Illuminati, the Jesuits and other secret orders that many conspiracy writers make reference to. They came to prominence in Venice around the 9th century and became known for their use of dirty tactics to accomplish what they wanted. Murder fraud, rape, genocide, terrorism...just about anything possible to protect their wealth and keep the common man where they believed he ought to be.....financial slavery.
When the black nobility eventually transcended further through strategic alliances with the Illuminati and freemasonry during the 1700s it was the worst nightmare for the developing world. An unholy trinity that would use the earths population at their disposal to protect their interests.
The black nobility became so powerful that even the Roman Catholic Church which ruled much of Europe became fearful of them with several botched attempts to conquer them. The irony of the matter is that when the Papacy's iron rule came to an end in 1870 it was the Black Nobility who were there to act as the comrades of the Pope in helping to negotiate the terms of the Vatican's future existence under Benito Mussolini.
The Gods of Mammon
The Black Nobles were so powerful that even Daniel Estulin, one of the worlds leading researchers on the Bilderbergers, was forced to admit that the likes of Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Roman Abramovich and even the Rothschild's and the Rockefellers are small change. The Black Nobility were not just Billionaires but Trillionaires.
This partnership was facilitated by series of major and significant events which had taken place prior, such as the Black Nobility being responsible for funding the creation of the Bank of Amsterdam in 1609 and the Bank of England in 1694 which these Anglo American power houses then used as a means to build their wealth and tie in nation after nation over the next several hundred years.
How They Respond to Opposition!
Today, fronted by the powerful family banking dynasties of Europe, the Black Nobility exercise supremacy over the world’s governments, as well as their economies, and even their cultures. Ultimately, they are an international network, existing in a parallel world, straddled between fronts of legitimacy, and activities on the black market and in the underground.
One of the most profound characteristics of the black nobility is their ongoing need to remove any individual that represents a threat to their interests. History is littered with example after example of men and women who were murdered in cold blood as a result of making one step too far.
The Illuminati - The Public Face of the Black Nobility
The Illuminati was the name of a secret society, founded by Adam Weishaupt, in Germany, in 1776, (in direct opposition to our 1776 founding) with the goal of seeking world domination through subversive means. It’s existence is one of the few instances in history in which historians are willing to recognize the existence of the diabolical conspiracy, because the evidence is undeniable.
The “Illuminati”, really, is merely a convenient term to refer to those individuals and secret organizations who continue to pursue the same goals in our time. The philosophy of this order’s existence began long before the eighteenth century. According to their own accounts though, the Illuminati represent the descendants of the Fallen Angels who inhabited the lost continent of Atlantis. These Fallen Angels interbred with humans, producing a supposedly superior race ”, to whom they taught the Ancient Wisdom. Therefore, the Illuminati regard themselves as inheritors of a centuries- long tradition of preserving their occult knowledge, against the “tyranny” and “despotism” of “organized religion”.
Ultimately, they perceive it their duty to institute a world order, to impose their cult as a one-world-religion, and governed by one of their own. Thus, throughout the centuries, the Illuminati have been carefully intermarrying with one another, to preserve their “sacred” bloodline, to transmit their esoteric knowledge from generation to generation, and from which their messiah is to issue. For this reason, they also refer to themselves as “the Family”.
Message to the Church in Philadelphia…
Rev3:8'I know your deeds. Behold, I have put before you an open door which no one can shut, because you have a little power, and have kept My word, and have not denied My name.
9 Behold, I will cause those of the synagogue of Satan, WHO SAY THEY ARE JEWS AND ARE NOT, BUT DO LIE -- I will make them come and bow down at your feet, and make them know that I have loved you. 10Because you have kept the word of My perseverance, I also will keep you from the HOUR OF TEMPTATION, that hour which is about to come upon the whole world, to test those who dwell on the earth.…
The "Kingdom" against "kingdom" SHOULD BE in FULL VIEW now.
Again I propose the question orignally asked this morniing in a BRIEF SNIPPET hoping to make you THINK while I worked on this today. I pray eyes are opening even wider, and when this "staged" American "crisis" happens and THEY NEED US TO THINK ITS THE RUSSIANS...that our eye is Firmly "focused" on WHO, and not fall to their TERRORIST , FEAR BASED "control" trying to drag the USA and Russia into a war against each other as THEY Israel open up new territroy in Ukraine making room for MORE "expansionism" of their tyrranny. Know That Father OUR FATHER is still on His Throne.
“What KIND of government would deliberately spend billions of dollars to destroy the reputations, and manipulate online discourse, of those who attempt to tell people the truth?”
Then ask, “What kind of press establishment allows the government to do this without being challenged?”
Your answers to these two questions can only lead to one conclusion…both your government, and your mainstream press, consider YOU to be the enemy.Then ask YOURSELF...why?
This is the "beginning" of YOUR AWAKENING!
7 comments:
We "counter" it in Spiritual Combat by "pulling out" of their USURIOUS System. If USURY is their "weapon" of Mass Destruction (and I almost giggle thinking they have so many fooled into looking under this rock , and under that rock for the BOOGIE MAN, and miss the BIGGEST THREAT TO OUR PLANET AND HUMANITY is USURY!!!!!!!!!!!).
Last night I could hear Christ when spoke of the parable of the TAX Collector (a usury free currence has no NEED for taxes, and then The Church becomes the METHOD OF "serving society and the poor". I can see today Jesus saying to the many welthy tied to their USURY gains from the stock-market (the Kenites SEAT)...go and SELL and "invest" in NON USURY "investments" in the poor, buidling tiny homes with a "fraction of the cost" and all these that are OUT OF WORK ..."put them to work in a 'barn-raisig fashion" and then upon that LABOR "pay them in kingdom usury-free currency" and then the kingdom PROSPERS. Its NOT about the "money or currency" or wealth but UPON WHICH IT IS BUILT!!!!!
Why Did Jesus Tell the Rich Young Ruler to Sell All that He Had?
We all know the story: A ruler comes to Jesus and says “what must I do to inherit the eternal life?” Jesus, instead of saying, “believe in me,” says “You know the commandments: Do not commit adultery, do not murder, do not steal, do not bear false witness, honor your father and mother” (Luke 18:18-19).
Already, this seems strange. We would expect Jesus to say: “Believe in me.” But instead he seems to say: “Keep the commandments.”
The rich young ruler then responds: “All these I have kept from my youth” (v. 21). To which Jesus responds: “One thing you still lack. Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me” (v. 22).
Why didn’t Jesus say “believe in me?” Why did he seem to tell this person that he would be saved by obeying the law?
A common interpretation is that Jesus was showing this guy his sin. Jesus’ point was not that he would be saved by keeping the commandments; his point was: “you haven’t kept the commandments, so you must be saved by another way — namely, by faith in me.”
Some people say that this interpretation is importing a theological system onto the text. That it seems too complex of a treatment of the passage.
But I don’t think it is. This becomes clear when you consider the account in Luke. For, in Luke, right before this Jesus had just told the parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector.
We all know that parable as well: The Pharisee came to the temple and said “God, I thank you that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all that I get” (Luke 18:11-12). The tax collector, on the other hand, wouldn’t even lift his eyes to heaven, and said “God, be merciful to me a sinner!” (v. 13).
Which one of these was justified?
Both?
No. Only the tax collector. “I tell you, this man went down to his house justified, rather than the other” (v. 14).
Here’s the point: The rich young ruler failed to learn the lesson of the Pharisee and tax collector. Jesus had just pointed out how the guy who claimed to have kept all the commandments was not justified. He then told us how we do become justified — namely, by acknowledging that we are sinners, like the tax collector, rather than law-keepers. It is after this that the rich young ruler comes up to Jesus and says “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
When Jesus says “you know the commandments,” and the rich young ruler responds “all these I have kept from my youth,” he is echoing the Pharisee from the passage just a few verses earlier. He, like the Pharisee, thinks he is a law keeper.
This stands out starkly in the text, simply due to the proximity of the parable of the Pharisee and tax collector, and the story of the rich young ruler. I know someone might say “well, these things might not have occurred so close together in Jesus’ actual ministry.” That might be true. But either way, the proximity in which Luke places them in his gospel tells us something about Luke’s intent and the point Luke wants to make.
And so, with the parable of the Pharisee and tax collector coming just before this (with the instance of the children coming to Jesus right in between — which makes the same point as the parable of the Pharisee and tax collector [“whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it”]), it is hard to escape the conclusion that Luke is indeed seeking to drive home the same lesson. It is hard to miss the similarity between what the Pharisee said about himself being a lawkeeper (18:11), and the rich young ruler claiming to be a lawkeeper (18:21).
Since the point of the parable of the Pharisee and tax collector is that the Pharisee was not a lawkeeper, but that all of us are like this tax collector — that is, sinful and in need of mercy (18:13-14), we ought to read the rich young ruler’s claim to have kept the commandments and say “no, you haven’t.”
And that’s what I think Jesus’ point is. When Jesus responds to him by saying “go sell all that you have,” Jesus is challenging him. Jesus is pressing further to make him see that he is not, in fact, a law keeper. Jesus is essentially saying to him: “OK, you don’t get it. So I’m going to show you that you aren’t a law keeper by challenging you on this point.” So he challenges him with the first and tenth commandments — to have no other gods and not to be covetous — by saying “go, sell all that you have.” And when the rich young ruler becomes sad at this, it shows that, like the tax collector, he is not a lawkeeper after all — he has broken the tenth commandment and first commandment by preferring money over God. (And by breaking these commandments, he has broken them all — for the tenth commandment is a restatement of the first, and the first commandment is the essence of all of them.)
But now the rich young ruler is actually in a good position. Jesus has just shown him that he is not a lawkeeper. He should now, like the tax collector, acknowledge his sins and turn to God for mercy. And Jesus even hinted at this when he also said “come, follow me” (v. 22).
Here’s the point: When Jesus said to him “you know the commandments” and even “go, sell all that you have,” Jesus was not saying that we become saved by keeping the commandments. That would contradict the point of the parable he had just told before this about the Pharisee and tax collector (18:9-14).
Rather, his point was to reinforce the point of that parable — that none of us are lawkeepers but are only justified by acknowledging our sinfulness, as the tax collector did (18:13-14). This is what it means to receive the kingdom of God as a child (18:17) — you don’t rely on your own efforts, but simply cry to God for mercy. Jesus was bringing the rich young ruler to see the same point about salvation that he just made in verses 13-14 and verse 17.
One objection: After the rich man goes away, Peter basically says “Hey, look, we did what you told him to do — we did leave our homes and follow you” (18:28). So does this indicate that, since Peter did do what Jesus told the rich young ruler to do, Jesus was actually saying he would be saved by selling all his possessions?
Not in the slightest. For if you look back to when Peter left everything to follow Jesus, you see something striking. After Jesus demonstrated his power by enabling the large catch of fish, notice what Peter did:
“When Simon Peter saw it, he fell down at Jesus’ knees, saying, ‘Depart from me, for I am a sinful man, O Lord.'” (Luke 5:8).
Notice that this is also in the gospel of Luke. Luke clearly intends for us to remember this. Here’s the point: Peter entered the kingdom just like the tax collector in the parable. He entered the kingdom by, like the tax collector, acknowledging his sinfulness and looking for mercy. And Jesus gave him mercy, and then Peter left everything to follow Jesus.
Acknowledging our sin and looking to Christ for mercy comes first. Then, lawkeeping follows. Those who think they are following the law without having humbled themselves like the tax collector (18:13-14) or a child (18:17) or Peter (5:8) are not following the law and are not saved.
But those who, like Peter and the tax collector, know that they are sinful and look to Christ for mercy — these people are then able to follow Jesus in radical obedience. But humbling ourselves by looking for justification apart from works comes first. Then, out of that, radical obedience flows — sometimes even to the point of, like Peter, leaving all our possessions in following Jesus.
Post a Comment