FIRST OF ALL... anyone that "claims" anything written herein is RACIST probably needs to re-examine their OWN biases. There is NO RACISM in God's Holy Word. Everything expounded upon here is all from God's Holy Word NOT "traditions of men".
Kenite has absolutely nothing to do at all in any way, shape, or form with Canaan or Canaanites. Anyone ever tell you this is a liar, or at best simply Biblical illiterate. The only RACE that God has anything against is the RACE of the Kenites who are of the "seed of Satan" and not of the "seed of God". God permitted this to occur for it is written by God that "whomsoever will" remains to "whomsoever will" even the Kenite...BUT THE CONDITION is ... if they so choose of their OWN free-will choice. Why? Because even Satan in permitting his seed to be born of flesh by inseminating Eve and baring their son Cain. And this is a DEEPER TEACHING and to not understand this is to not be MATURE in Christ.
ALL "flesh" has this EQUAL OPPORTUNITY and "whomsoever will" means just that... "whomsoever will". That means "ALL FLESH." God intended all the races of mankind/flesh to be "purebred" especially the Hebrew Nation. Why? It was separated (sanctified) in Genesis only and was intended to show the bloodline of the Messiah and not separate the races of the 6th and or 8th day or any other race. Anyone that claims this is a liar and is a false teacher. More than likely it is the listener or student that exhibits these sick symptoms of paranoia and parasitoid. The Kenite, races; if that is what one wishes to call them, were NOT created by God. Anyone that says this is ridiculously inane and most likely an Illiterate as well. This is what teachers are for to teach the illiterate and give them information to grow to adulthood. Mature. Unfortunately most do not especially in the realm of religion and is as it is written Apostasy of satan that these five out of seven type Christian churches are losing favor with Christ as stated in the great book of Revelation and is to be in these last days or generation of the good and bad figs. It is a shame more people cannot recognize that satan is the enemy and not their fellow brethren.
The Kenites are a race of people created by satan and not God. It is an intermingling with God's creation, mankind and satan's creation, his spiritual lust for that same flesh of women. It is an abomination to God Almighty as He has stated throughout scriptures. They are the seed of satan and not to be touched in case one were to root up the seed of God in the process. Do not separate the tares from the wheat. This action is reserved for God and the reaping angels alone as it is written. Anyone that calls the Kenites "brother" are sadly mistaken. They do nothing but uproot and cause dissention and were and are solely responsible for the crucification of Jesus Christ and have been a thorn in the side of God as well as our brothers, Judah, who have taken most of the blame due to the lack of knowledge and the process of ignorance of the world and through religion have spread the lies till they cannot be met intelligently by most religionists of today also against the very word of God who told all the houses to teach your children from generation to generation so that they would know the truth of both who God is and who the enemy was forever. Unfortunately this is lost forever except by two of the seven church types of Christ. Others have been told this very same type of dissention among other races, the black race for example, causing those people to have to apologize for being who they are. This is sad and ridiculous and is not called for. Only the prejudices of mankind are what keep people "down." If they learned the truth there would be no more violence against races or creeds. Unfortunately most do not see this nor accept the fact that it is the Kenites and the Kenites alone that continue this dissention among the people of the world.
The Kenites cannot work in the daylight and always work behind the scenes and in the darkness like their father. Like the Hebrews that were scattered among the nations of the world so were the Kenites. This is a fact of life whether certain individuals wish to admit it or not. The smoothing of the stones is written whether people wish to understand it or not. It is what it is and there is nothing they or anyone can do about it. God said He knows who they are and where they all are as He does all of us. God's time is coming and soon all tares shall be removed from the golden wheat of God's children. Even the Kenites whether by blood or adoption are able, according to God, to receive the kingdom of Heaven. Whosoever will means whosoever, anyone. It is up to the individual in this flesh age. God judges by the individual NOT by a nation or race. Like the Hebrews the Kenites have "lost their identity," and do not all know who they are, some do. By their fruits shall all be revealed, good and bad figs cannot help but show their true colors, like Leopards they cannot change their spots. Like our brother Judah, the Lions, who now maintain a state in the Middle East known as "Israel" the Kenites are closing in on them on all sides and they are the ones that know who they are and know the truth.
Throughout the Middle East most Middle Easterners know who the Kenites are and practice the teaching of it from China to Palestine. From the Northern Syria to the Persian Gulf. But it is the ones that are scattered and have lost their identity and do not realize who they are that cause a lot of trouble for the rest of the world, mainly the United States and modern Europe. There are and has been so much intermingling of the lineages throughout the millenniums that the "smoothing of stones" has produced Kenites in people that may not even realize that they are in fact Kenite in mixture with the rest of their ancestries. Anyone that denies this is a fool or a Biblical Illiterate and should be denounced and left alone. As it is written leave them alone lest you root out a possibility that they, even they, may change their hearts from financial wealth and commerce of rich over the poor, evil over good, etc. Anyone that apologizes for their race are only doing it because of these types of individuals that go around lying to the world and generations because they are inward Kenites themselves and are to be held very suspicious, by God's own word, either you are for God or are against Him.
It is up to Biblical scholars to educate and teach these and all races that they are who they are and it was not intended to be this way by God but was caused by satan and satan alone. In the end all the races will be brought back together in the spirit and the eternity and shall be again as pure and righteous as they were when they were first created and placed in the flesh from the foundations of the world. Many ask or think why does God allow this or do that and it is NOT of His will but because of people and or satan and his handy works that cause burdens and other things in this world to occur. Lack of education and passing down from generation to generation has cause serious consequences that cannot be avoided in every day life. There is only one exception, as it is written, to this rule or mixing and they are called Mamzars. Mamzars are NOT bad people and anyone saying this is a liar and illiterate of God's word. Do not ever apologize about your color or race or creed or even a mixing or mingling only strive with dignity to, as God said it, "know who the enemy is." It is not Religion of Christianity as it is NOT a religion but used by religionists as an excuse for their lack of knowledge and wisdom and morally corrupt values. CORBAN! Christianity is NOT a religion it is a REALITY and a FACT of LIFE. Use it don't ever abuse it. God loves all that He created in the flesh and do not ever let anyone else tell you anything different. It is written! ALL souls are mine!
The study of the Kenites is NOT racism but is to know who the enemy is and to leave them alone by marking them not by physical marks or scars or wars but by memory and with all intelligence shake the dust off your sandals and leave them for it will be better for them that accept you than those that turn you away in the name of Christ and this so-called "religion" of Christianity. The knowledge of the Kenites is not a matter of one's salvation but is an aid in helping people to know that it is not God's fault that evil exists in the world and to know that it is these types of people, (Kenite spirited), that are going to lead others to the synagogues of satan and to the false Messiah and shall lead them to their eternal damnation. So, one had better wake up because there are a lot of people out there that are totally confused and thus instead of learning not to hate turn around themselves and call it racism exposing their hatred towards their Brethren. The Kenites originally were bad folk but they have been so mixed throughout the millenniums that they are mixed with the pureblood of some of the children of God after Tubalcain and his brother. Not all Kenites are that bad. But regardless we are told that in the end of days they like the "Leopard" that they are will show their true spots and we all will see that they have not changed one iota.
Kenites
ke'-nits (ha-qeni, haqeni; in Nu 24:22 and Jdg 4:11, from qayin; the name of Cain in English. In Hebrew meaning of hoi Kenaioi, hoi Kinaioi): A tribe of nomads named in association with various other peoples. The term "ha-qeni" or "ha-qayin" means of or from Cain. They are first mentioned along with the Kadmonites and Kenizzites among the peoples whose land was promised to Abram (Gen 15:19). Balaam, seeing them from the heights of Moab; puns upon their name, which resembles the Hebrew, "ken," "a nest," prophesying their destruction although their nest was "set in the rock" possibly a reference to Sela, the city. Moses' father-in-law, Jethro, is called "the priest of Midian" in Ex 3:1; 18:1; but in Jdg 1:16 he is described as a Kenite, showing a close relation between the Kenites and Midian. Not that he was in fact of Kenite descent but the descendants of Midian dwelled with or near them. At the time of Sisera's overthrow, Heber, a Kenite, at "peace" with Jabin, king of Hazor, pitched his tent far North of his ancestral seats (Jdg 4:17). There were Kenites dwelling among the Amalekites in the time of Saul (1 Sam 15:6). They were spared because they had "showed kindness to all the children of Israel, when they came up out of Egypt." Wanderers never to have a place of their own and nomads living in tents working as smiths and makers of all weapons and artificers of all sorts traveled with the Hebrew tribes in the wilderness for 40 years.Genesis 4:22 "And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructor of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah."Genesis 4:11 God speaking to Cain: "And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother's blood from thy hand; Gen 4:12 When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth." Many find that passage confusing especially when elsewhere it seems that they, (Kenites/sons of Kain/Qayin), dwell in lands and seem to have settled down. This is a false notion. Notice first they always "dwell" in OTHER'S lands never has there been a place called Kenite or Ken-anything, and secondly when God cursed Cain to be a nomad or "vagabond" and traveler it was obviously his offspring that suffered most not necessarily the man that was cursed. In other words, Cain was cursed but it is his offspring that must bear that curse from generation to generation. David, in his answer to Achish, links the Kenites with the inhabitants of the South of Judah (1 Sam 27:10). Among the ancestors of the tribe of Judah, the Chronicler includes the Kenite Hammath, the father of the Rechabites (1 Ch 2:55). These last continued to live in tents, practicing the ancient nomadic customs (Jer 35:6 ff). "Richly varied landscape, With smiling cornfields, and hills clothed with oak and terebinth." Genesis 4:20 "And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such as dwell in tents, and of such as have cattle." Interestingly, the word Hemath is used interchangeably with the name Hamath, which is situated just north of Damascus, Syria. References made to Hamath, indicate that these people were descendants of the Canaanites Genesis 10:18. Canaan, of course, being the cursed son of Ham, cursed by Noah NOT God. So, the Kenites lived in the land that belonged to the Canaanites. KENITE, by definition, is literally, "Sons of Cain." From (Strong's #7014) "Qayin." Rechab was a Kenite and his son Jonadab was their acknowledged leader. The same as 7013 (with a play upon the affinity to 7069); Kajin, the name of the first child, also of a place in Palestine, and of an Oriental tribe: KJV uses - Cain, Kenite(-s). 7013 from 6969 in the original sense of fixity; a lance (as striking fast): KJV uses - spear. 6969 quwn; koon, a primitive root; to strike a musical note, i.e. chant or wail (at a funeral): KJV uses - lament, mourning woman. Genesis 4:21"And his brother's name was Jubal: he was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ." 7069 qanah kaw-naw' a primitive root; to erect, i.e. create; by extension, to procure, especially by purchase (causatively, sell); by implication to own: KJV uses - attain, buy(-er), teach to keep cattle, get, provoke to jealousy, possess(-or), purchase, recover, redeem, X surely, X verily. Genesis 4:20 "And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such as dwell in tents, and of such as have cattle." All point to Cain no matter how you look at it the only Hebrew transliteration for Kenite is and has only one and that is "Sons of Cain." Like Moabites are sons of Moab, etc. Genesis 4:9 "And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother's keeper?"The word 'Keeper' is (#8104) shamar--> to shepherd, observe, protect. Since this 'one' was Abel's brother, then it would naturally follow that he should be associated with him, and at the least bear some responsibility for his welfare. So for him to have said in effect, 'He's my brother, but I have no care for him', is both a twisted statement of incongruous terms, and a telling indictment--same womb--different seed. Even so, they were half- brothers; therefore, Cain is a liar, (for his denial of his fraternal responsibility), and for saying he didn't know where Abel was--gee, that makes two lies doesn't it? Sounds like that serpent in Eden, (who spoke those two lies back in Gen 3:4-5). He is a murderer too... he didn't learn that from "his parents"...and can't say he had a bad home. We know genes aren't all that influential in one's thinking and behavior-but the soul that was created before the flesh came into being, had a behavior and history all its own-and free will to act on impulses.
*Here is the curse that Cain earned: Genesis 4:12 "When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth." No luck at farming. A wanderer with no nation to call his own. So he would have to mingle with and depend upon the nations built by others, for his home and livelihood. (#5110)-->nuwd: vagabond, to wander, to flee, to mourn. Obviously, not a good thing to be. (#5128)--nuwa, fugitive, to continually be on the run, to waver--be on the move.
The word "qeni" in Aramaic means "smith." Professor Sayce thinks they may really have been a tribe of smiths, resembling "the gipsies of modern Europe, as well as the traveling tinkers or blacksmiths of the Middle Ages" (HDB, under the word). This would account for their relations with the different peoples, among whom they would reside in pursuit of their calling. Jeremiah 35:5-10 "And I set before the sons of the house of the Rechabites pots full of wine… (v. 6) But they said, We will drink no wine: for Jonadab the son of Rechab our father commanded us, saying, Ye shall drink no wine, neither ye, nor your sons for ever: (v. 7) Neither shall ye build house, nor sow seed, nor plant vineyard, nor have any: but all your days ye shall dwell in tents; that ye may live many days in the land where ye be strangers. (v. 10) But we have dwelt in tents, and have obeyed, and done according to all that Jonadab our father commanded us."
Notice, the Lord commanded Jeremiah to set wine before the Kenites-in the HOUSE of GOD. They did not drink out of unswerving loyalty to THEIR father. Nor did they farm, or build homes or cities-wanderers living off the land of others-exactly like Cain as was ordered by God. What wine is drunk in God's House? The wine of His covenant. And later, the wine of His new covenant-the blood. God's covenant with His people and His blood, partaken of by His children. These children of another father would not partake of such a covenant. One naïve reference I read likens the Rechabites to Nazarites because of their abstinence from wine, and claims that these Kenites hated Baal worship because of Jehonadab/Jonadab's alliance with Jehu, an Israelite king. Jehu was one of the most bloodthirsty kings of Israel, and was denounced because he refused to rid the land of all idolatry.
This indicates that the king only rid the land of Baal worship because it afforded him an opportunity to do battle-not because his heart was right! There is NO evidence scripturally, to support the claim that the Rechabites were Baal-haters-only that Jehonadab saw a favorable alliance, and took advantage of it. Remember, the Rechabites had no territory, and led a nomadic existence. They depended on their alliances to support them. Mercenary work was one good way to ensure survival. Taking the Kenites' abstinence from wine as comparable to the oath of a Nazarite, one who has sworn an oath to God, is both taken out of context and is very dangerous. The reason as to why our Father, the true God had the Kenites brought in to the Lord's House, is given in the following scriptures:
Jeremiah 35:14 "The words of Jonadab the son of Rechab, that he commanded his sons not to drink wine, are performed; for unto this day they drink none, but obey THEIR FATHER'S commandment: notwithstanding I have spoken unto you (Israel), rising early and speaking; but ye hearkened not unto me."
Jeremiah 35:18-19 "And Jeremiah said unto the house of the Rechabites, Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Because ye have obeyed the commandment of Jonadab YOUR FATHER, and kept all his precepts, and done according unto all that he hath commanded you: (v. 19) Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Jonadab the son of Rechab shall not want a man to stand before me for ever."
The Lord was using the example of the Kenites' loyalty to THEIR FATHER, as a way of embarrassing the children of Israel, who were stiff-necked and not obedient to God, their Father, soddish children. The Lord then promises that the Kenites will never lack for leadership, in the midst of not only the Israelites and their descendants, but IN THE HOUSE OF GOD. Why? Where did all this take place? Outside by some well? Out in some field? In a barroom? NO. In the House of GOD. This was done to HAUNT the Israelites for all time whilst in the flesh. A glaring humiliation so that they would not forget. But they forgot anyway. There is even a rabbinic tradition which claims that the daughters of Rechab married the sons of Levitical priests! (Nelson's bible dictionary).
God didn't set Kenites in the temple for Israel to embrace! These are the children of Rechab, who was the descendant of Cain, who was the son of satan. Not a smart move to marry God's priests to the children of CAIN!Tracing the descendants of Cain, requires noting that his progeny was not included in that of Adam's descendants, (Genesis Chapter 5). This was no glaring oversight, or 'punishment' for the murder of Abel. Regardless of what Cain did, IF he was Adam's son, then his offspring would still be counted among Adam's. There are plenty abominable acts recorded throughout the Word, as committed by heinous men, whose lineage is clear. Yet these men, were not cast aside as no longer of their father. This complete dismissal of Cain is another clear indication that he was NOT Adam's son. Another interesting note is at verse 3 of Chapter 5. Notice the distinction of; "a son in his own likeness, after his image and called his name Seth." Implying here as opposed to Cain that Seth was made in the image or likeness of Adam. This use of likeness and image is more receptive or conducive of a father and his son. More impressive is it was in his "OWN" likeness. Not of someone else's. Cain is not Adam's Son! People can deny it all they want but truth is truth. Genesis 4:16 "And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden."
The presence of the Lord (paniym #6440). This verse and the verses before it, speak of the terribleness of this fate, when Cain says in Genesis 4:14:"...from thy face shall I be hid". "Hid" is: (#5641) cathar; to hide, be absent. And this word 'face' is the same as that for presence--paniym. He would be absent from and unable to approach the face of God--whether he set foot in God's tabernacle, or not. Nod is (#5713) 'nowd', and signifies only 'vagrancy' and 'exile', not a specific geographical land. The word for East is qidmah (#6926); 'forward'; and from (#6924) qedem & (#6923) qedmah: 'ancient time', 'past', 'everlasting'. So, Cain was exiled from entering God's presence, His favor--away from Him; more a spiritual exile than geographical, but "on the east of Eden" tells us that it is also a geographical distance. Most scholars believe the land of Nod to have been what is now known as Outer Mongolia, to the East.
Another example of Cain's unusual origins, often interpreted as strictly of a spiritual nature:I John 3:12 "Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous." Notice, that the Greek word "of" is (#1537) 'ek'. This word is used to describe those things which 'emanate from the origin'. Picture a circle, with a line extending from a point in the center that proceeds outward. 'Ek' can refer to time or space, but also to generative functions as seen in these passages: Matthew 1:18, 20; 3:9; 19:12; Luke 1:27; 2:4; 3:8; John 3:6. It is a generic term in many passages, yet of all the prepositions translated 'of', 'ek' is the word which describes the innermost depth of spiritual and physical origins; the 'bowels' of whatever is described, with few exceptions existing, including those passages where the subject is time. It also can denote physical motion as shown in the use of another Greek word as seen in the book of Jude. Jude 1:7 "Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire." FORNICATION: G#1608 ἐκπορνεύω ekporneuo; ek-porn-yoo'-o From G#1537 and G4203; to be utterly unchaste: KJV uses only - give self over to fornication. G#1537
"ek."AND G#4203 πορνεύω porneuo¯ porn-yoo'-o From G4204; to act the harlot, that is, (literally) indulge unlawful lust (of either sex), or (figuratively) practise idolatry: KJV uses only - commit (fornication). Well let's do one more word shall we? 2 Corinthians 11:3 "But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ."
First NOTE: The word "beguile" used ONLY in this verse is G#1818. The only other two uses in the New Testament are Colossians 2:4 and 2:18. It is NOT G#1818 but G#3884. They are two different translations. Let's look at G#1818 shall we or can you stand to KNOW the TRUTH? Does the truth hurt your poor baby ears? Does the word of God offend you? It's time to mature as Paul said. Then you can remain in BONDAGE shackled to the traditional bonds of mans ways of thinking and teaching or God's the choice has always been yours! G1818 ἐξαπατάω exapatao; ex-ap-at-ah'-oFrom G#1537 and G#538; to seduce wholly: KJV uses only - beguile, deceive. There is that G#1537 physical act of motion word: "EK!" Either live a lie which casts chains on you or live in truth, which as IT, will set you free!
There are "types" given in physical terms in the Word but more important to remember, is the spiritual corruption of man, from which no lineage is exempt (Absalom would be a fine example). We therefore read the past with the enlightened understanding that those who are elect were chosen before, and though many are and were of the seed of Jacob, there were and are now those of ALL other lineages also chosen as God's elect. All the confusion of thought and conflicting exegesis have arisen from taking literally what is expressed by Figures, or from taking figuratively what is literal. A Figure of speech is never used except for the purpose of calling attention to, emphasizing, and intensifying, the reality of the literal sense, and the truth of the historical facts; so that, while the words employed may not be so strictly true to the letter, they are all the more true to the truth conveyed by them, and to the historical events connected with them. (This is done by what is termed a, "parable").
Looking at the passages surrounding this one in 1st John, the subject is clearly to distinguish between God's children and satan's kids:
I John 3:8-10 "He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil. (v.9) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. (v.10) In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother." One might casually interpret these passages as 'spiritual' in the strictest sense, UNTIL, it is recognized that two oddities exist. One: a specific man is named, who is clearly listed as NOT of Adam's progeny and is 'of the wicked one' in the deepest sense of origins. Two: and more striking, is that virtually all NT passages using the word 'seed' that apply this word in a spiritual context have it as (#4703) 'sporos', which is defined as a scattering or sowing of something. Passages using 'seed' that express lineage or generative function use almost exclusively the word (#4690) 'sperma', defined as male sperm or in the strictest sense of physical seed such as seen in a plant. Both 'sporos' and 'sperma' share a root - (#4687) 'speiro', yet the context in which these two words are used shows a clear distinction.. Here then, in these 'strictly spiritual' passages listed above, what could be the reason for the word for seed given as 'sperma'? Lineage, along with the specifics given of a man (Cain or "Kain" in Hebrew), show us that more than a spiritual distinction is given-the physical connection becomes clearer.
Genesis 4:9 "And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother's keeper?"
The word 'Keeper' is (#8104) shamar and means, to shepherd, observe, protect. Since this 'one' was Abel's brother, then it would naturally follow that he should be associated with him, and at the least bear some responsibility for his welfare. So for him to have said in effect, 'He's my brother, but I have no care for him', is both a twisted statement of incongruous terms, and a telling indictment--same womb--different seed. Even so, they were half- brothers; therefore, Cain is a liar, (for his denial of his fraternal responsibility), and for saying he didn't know where Abel was, gee, that makes two lies doesn't it?
Genesis records Cain's progeny in 4:17-24, where six generations are given: Cain-Enoch-Irad-Mehujael-Lamech-and Lamech's sons: Jubal and Tubalcain. The next time we read of them is in this passage:
Numbers 24:21-22 "And he looked on the Kenites, and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwellingplace, and thou puttest thy nest in a rock. Nevertheless the Kenite shall be wasted, until Asshur shall carry thee away captive."
Asshur, Son of Shem, and ancestor of the Assyrians, and a type of antichrist used in Isaiah; Gen_10:11; Gen_10:22; 1Ch_1:17; Eze_32:22; Balaam, the prophet of God, allows Balak, to see what will occur to several peoples at the time of the end-the latter days. He prophesizes concerning the fate of the Kenites - the descendants or sons of Cain. The word for nest is (#7064) 'qen', a fixed dwelling in a rock (#5553) 'cela' which is defined as a craggy rock, an impenetrable fortress. We know that a 'fixed dwelling' can't refer to the Kenites' physical habitation, since they are wanderers and nomads, and have no fixed nation for themselves. They must provide services to others for their livelihood. This 'nest' in the 'rock' refers to the source of their strength and their trust. So in what 'rock' do these people trust?
Let's look at the "Song of Moses" spoken of from Revelation Chapter 15:
Deuteronomy 32:27-30 "Were it not that I feared the wrath of the enemy, lest their adversaries should behave themselves strangely, and lest they should say, Our hand is high, and the LORD hath not done all this." (v. 28) "For they are a nation void of counsel, neither is there any understanding in them." (v. 29) "O that they were wise, that they understood this, that they would consider their latter end!" (v. 30) "How should one chase a thousand, and two put ten thousand to flight, except their rock had sold them, and the LORD had shut them up?"
Moses speaks of the enemy's boasting in v. 27, "of whom if Israel fell would say it was their doing and not God's." He then talks about Israel's forgetfulness, forgetting Israel's ROCK, the source of their strength and life. Notice the different uses of "Rock" and "rock," throughout it. One capitalized and one not.
Deuteronomy 32:31-37 "FOR THEIR rock IS NOT AS OUR Rock, EVEN OUR ENEMIES THEMSELVES BEING JUDGES." (v. 32) "For their vine is of the vine of Sodom, and of the fields of Gomorrah: their grapes are grapes of gall, their clusters are bitter:" (v. 33) "Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps." (v. 34) "Is not this laid up in store with me, and sealed up among my treasures?" (v. 35) "To me belongeth vengeance, and recompence; their foot shall slide in due time: for the day of their calamity is at hand, and the things that shall come upon them make haste." (v. 36) "For the LORD shall judge his people, and repent himself for his servants, when he seeth that THEIR POWER IS GONE, AND THERE IS NONE SHUT UP, OR LEFT." (v. 37) "And he shall say, Where are their gods, THEIR rock in whom they trusted."
Moses speaks of Israel's enemies, as evidenced in the subject-change. The one in whom the foe places their hope is a "false" one, distinguished from the True. He speaks of the eventual downfall of the enemy-but not until Israel's' descendants are at their weakest-no protection-His remnant-His elect killed or all but almost gone. That refers to the latter days. THEN, He will avenge, and take His kingdom-for good.
This Deuteronomy 32 passage is the "Song of Moses." It is referred to in: Revelation 15:3 "And they sing the SONG OF MOSES the servant of God, and the SONG OF THE LAMB, saying, Great and marvellous are thy works, Lord God Almighty; just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints." Two songs.
That 'rock' in whom the enemy trusts, notice the lower case, is the same as that in whom the Kenites build their 'nest' as described in Numbers Chapter 24. That same 'King of Tyre' or 'Tyrus' which means "rock," from Ezekiel 28, but is a 'false' rock.
We know that these 'sons of Cain' dwelt in close proximity to others due to their nomadic existence. They were highly dependent upon their neighbors. The scriptures give more specific information and clues to how Israel related to them:Genesis 15:18-21 "In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: (v.19) The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, (v.20) And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, (v.21) And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites."
This passage is rather broad in the territory occupied, which includes many peoples, but the Word gets more specific:1 Samuel 15:5-6 "And Saul came to a city of Amalek, and laid wait in the valley. (v.6) And Saul said unto the Kenites, Go, depart, get you down from among the Amalekites, lest I destroy you with them: for ye shewed kindness to all the children of Israel, when they came up out of Egypt. So the Kenites departed from among the Amalekites."
Here, the specifics of their location is undeniable…they were among the Amalekites, dwelling within their cities. The location of this stronghold that Saul and his men took without mercy is given by the following reference: Eventually, the Amalekites gained a mountain in the land of Ephraim. King Saul of Israel won this area back and then chased the Amalekites from the land <1 Sam. 14:48; 15:1-9>; (from Nelson's Illustrated Bible Dictionary) (Copyright (C) 1986, Thomas Nelson Publishers). The other note to be taken mention of is in the fact of how the Kenites "snuggled" up to the Israelites and maintained and kept a continuous relationship.
Ephraim's territory at that time was situated just north of Jerusalem, and west of the Jordan (Hammond's Atlas of the Bible Lands, 1984). Of course, that territory was the land or area called Canaan, prior to the Israelites claim to it; and it has already been established that the Kenites dwelt among the Canaanites, KEYWORD: " AMONG," prior to the Israelite's Exodus. Therefore, the Kenites were well situated to dwell among the Israelites; and since they had previously 'shown kindness' to the Israelites; they were (therefore) spared a worse fate than their hosts. Again, the kindness of these Kenites is largely due to their dependence upon others for their living. Had they any substantial holdings, or land to defend, it is highly unlikely that any 'kindness' would have been bestowed; since they would be meeting up with a people, who were instructed to conquer and show no deference to any in their path, to acquire land. A nomadic people would, however, stand to gain much by being generous and snuggling up to their "paternal" brethren. The fact is also shown that in fact as they themselves stated in John Chapter 8 that they never were in captivity by the Egyptians like their brother Judah. The term "Jew" in the Greek; Ioudaios, (ee-oo-day'-yos) (2453), has only two meanings and are inclusive of both in the translation and are; one, being of the tribe of Judah and two, being a person that lives in the land of Judea. Not the same as the Hebrew; "yehudhi."
Another indicator of where these Kenites settled:1 Samuel 30:26-31 "And when David came to Ziklag, he sent of the spoil unto the elders of Judah, even to his friends, saying, Behold a present for you of the spoil of the enemies of the LORD;…(v.29) And to them which were in Rachal, and to them which were in the cities of the Jerahmeelites, and to them which were in the cities of the Kenites, (v.30) And to them which were in Hormah, and to them which were in Chorashan, and to them which were in Athach, (v.31) And to them which were in Hebron, and to all the places where David himself and his men were wont to haunt."
These locations are in southern Judah, and again, show the intermingling and close relationship of the Kenites and their host territories, since David's men were 'wont to haunt' these places.1 Chronicles 2:55 "And the families of the scribes which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab."
And here it is seen, as recorded in Chronicles (written after Judah's captivity), that the Rechabites (a branch of Kenites) were 'employed' as scribes. The record of this 'employment' is later than the incident of their "invitation" into the House of God as described in Jeremiah (before the Fall of Jerusalem to the Babylonians). It is unclear, however, as to the exact period of their first employment. It is possible, that the role of scribe ship was bestowed upon these Kenites, after the "invitation" as recorded in Jeremiah. Such an "invitation", would have paved the way for these sons of Kain, to gain this important job; and therefore, put the priesthood within their reach. This is tenable, if the rabbinic tradition of Rechabite women marrying Levitical priests holds true.
It is easily documented that these Kenites, and in particular the Rechabites, held a close association with the Israelites, from the time of the Exodus and onward. Many individuals even hold to the notion, that Jethro/Reuel/Hobab/Raguel, the father-in-law of Moses, was a 'Kenite'. First, there has been a question of all these names ascribed to Jethro, as noted in the following reference:
JETH'RO: (jeth'ro; "excellence, superiority"). A priest or prince of Midian, both offices probably being combined in one person. It is said in that the priest of Midian whose daughter Moses married was Reuel. But in <Exodus 3:1> he is called Jethro, as in <Exodus 4:18> and in Exodus Chapter 18, he is called "Hobab the son of Reuel the Midianite" (cf. ). Jethro and Reuel were probably different names of Moses' father-in-law (the former being either a title or a surname showing the rank of Reuel in his tribe), and the son, Hobab, was probably his brother-in-law. (from New Unger's Bible Dictionary) (originally published by Moody Press of Chicago, Illinois. Copyright (C) 1988).
The reference makes the most sense of these various names/appellatives for the man, and it is not uncommon for appellatives to be ascribed to men throughout the Word. Jethro was, after all, a priest, and not just a common Midianite man. The passage most used to document that Jethro was a Kenite by lineage, is shown in the book of Judges:
Judges 4:11 "Now Heber the Kenite, which was of the children of Hobab the father in law of Moses, had severed himself from the Kenites, and pitched his tent unto the plain of Zaanaim, which is by Kedesh."
First, Hobab, whether or not he IS Moses' father-in-law or brother-in- Law, was a Midianite by lineage. That he was a priest, makes it doubly sure of his lineage, because not just anyone who called himself of a nation or people, could claim priesthood; any more than an Israelite would be allowed to partake of his peoples' priesthood, without first establishing his lineage as a Levite. We know that the Midianites were of Abraham's children by his wife Keturah. It is clear that the Kenites and Midianites shared territory, but there is no evidence that lineages were mingled. One who lives amongst a people will naturally take the name of those peoples. Countless examples from old and in modern day attest to that fact. That Heber 'severed' himself from the Kenites, and says that he lived among them. But he was of Hobab by lineage. That would explain his ease in removing himself from among them-very little loyalty there-after, all, he was not RELATED to them.The other passage commonly used to 'mark' Jethro and other Midianites to the Kenites (by lineage) is also seen:
Judges 1:16 "And the children of the Kenite, Moses' father in law, went up out of the city of palm trees with the children of Judah into the wilderness of Judah, which lieth in the south of Arad; and they went and dwelt among the people."
The phrase 'children of the Kenite' seems to imply that one Kenite is the focus. Yet this word: (#7017) Qeyniy (kay-nee'); a Kenite or member of the tribe of Kajin, has use in the singular and plural, and is dependent upon context. In other words, it could well be plural here. Notice, this passage says nothing about the man, Jethro, or in fact, any specific man. The translators would have us believe that the Kenites were the children of one Midianite priest! It states that the Kenites went with the tribe of Judah and dwelt with them. This implies a relationship, based on contract or convenience. Remember, these Kenites provided a 'service' to the Israelites, and therefore, they in turn, could expect 'payment' in kind. Since the Israelites were a large defensible force, they could provide protection and a livelihood for these nomadic people.
Tares/Wheat
The context of the passage, also makes the use of the phrase 'Moses' father in law' immediately suspect. This passage is talking about a people dwelling with another people, not one man's family. This is illustrated by examining the phrase: 'father in law' in comparison to the other occurrences of the phrase. The ROOT word translated as 'father in law' (#2859) chathan (khaw-than'), means to give (a daughter) away in marriage; hence generally, to contract affinity by marriage: join in affinity, father in law, make marriages, mother in law, son in law. BUT, in many passages where 'father in law' is found, the word is: 'chotanow'-- a combination of 'his' and 'father in law', making it clear that a connection exists between one person and the role of the other, by the insertion of the word 'his' into the phrase. In cases where the specific man's name is given, then the word 'choteen' is sufficient, to show the relationship between the man, and his role as 'father in law', toward another person.
The Interlinear Bible makes this distinction clear. In the case of the above passage however; the word used is 'choteen'. It is alone, with no specific name, or possessive pronoun, such as 'his' or 'hers'. The name of Moses, is in direct proximity to 'choteen'; therefore, it is tempting to link the two-hence the translation: "Moses' father in law". This phrasing with the word 'choteen' is bereft or dispossessed of a specific name and is linked to Moses' name as used in Exodus:
Exodus 18:14 "And when Moses' father in law saw all that he did to the people, he said, What is this thing that thou doest to the people? why sittest thou thyself alone, and all the people stand by thee from morning unto even?"
Romans Chapter 9 will give you more info on the Kenites and the falling away and who they are.
John 8:44 "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (Of his own: or, from his own will or disposition). (Kenites).
Zechariah 8:23. NOTE: Some already coming to pass today.
Jeremiah 8:8-9. (Kenites as priests).
1Chronicles 2:55 And the families of the scribes who dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab. Kenites as Scribes.
"Kenite" in the Hebrew simply has one meaning and that is "Son or child of Kain." Son, bar' in Greek, means; kinship, blood. It is just that, a race of people, a tribe of people. A baby has no choice where it is born, it is just born. People can turn bad but that doesn't mean that does not make them a Kenite. A "Kenite" means; a child of Kain unless it is in that genealogy sorry it doesn't happen that way. But, what happens to a Kenite that believes upon God or the Messiah? They are no longer a "tare" or a Kenite, just a child of God, (John 8:37--51).
Song of Solomon 2:15 "Foxes" are the Kenites. The Kenites want to take away communion.
Acts 7:52 Stephen tells who crucified Christ it was the Kenites, "fathers" speaking of the offspring of Cain.
Act 7:52 "Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? and they have slain them which shewed before of the coming of the Just One; of whom ye have been now the betrayers and murderers:
Act 7:53 Who have received the law by the disposition of angels, and have not kept it." (Kenites).
Matthew 23:31 to 34 backs Stephen up.Mat 23:31 "Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.
Mat 23:32 Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.
Mat 23:33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
Mat 23:34 Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city." Moses was the "lawgiver." Jesus was NOT talking to the Jews that is to say they from the tribe of Judah. (Kenites).
Revelation 2:9; 3:9 Synagogues of satan are church type assemblies that are of satan and not of Christ. (Kenites). The Kenites walked in the worship of Astheroth.
Judges 1:16 "And the children of the Kenite, Moses' father in law, went up out of the city of palm trees with the children of Judah into the wilderness of Judah, which lieth in the south of Arad; and they went and dwelt among the people."
No mention of Jethro--no man is speaking, and the passage is clearly one of a contractual nature between two peoples. It is true that in passages where the word 'chathan' is translated as 'affinity' or 'contract', such as in I Kings 3:1 and II Chronicles 18:1, that the words are: 'wayit-chateen' and 'uwlhit-chateen'. These combinations give the words a distinct meaning, apart from 'choteen' and 'chotanow', which are used to assign relationships of a more personal nature.
The point to be made concerning Judges 1:16 is, that the generic use of the word 'choteen', as applied here, has no pronoun or name affixed to it. Contrast this to the clear use of the word in other passages. This further muddies the generalized relationship, alluded to by the context. It appears that the relationship is merely one of service or contract, and for this reason, the phrase 'father in law' seems oddly out of place. On the basis of analysis, it is difficult to associate these Kenites with Moses' father-in-law by anything more than territory. Notice too, that 'children of the Kenite' is matched with 'children of Judah'; thereby making it clear that the passage speaks of a large clan of peoples, and not a single family or small group of families, since Judah's tribe was quite large at that time. Jethro was a contemporary of Moses, with the time of this 'dwelling together' occurring soon after Joshua's death; therefore, his family would consist of a small group of people-not a tribe large enough to constitute a nation.
It should be clear that the Kenites were in close proximity to the Israelites and to the Canaanites, and that these Kenites regularly carried out their daily affairs with both peoples. The Canaanites consisted of several tribes: Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites, Girgashites, Jebusites, Amorites and Gibeonites. The last mentioned is particularly interesting, (#1391) Gibown, same as (#1387) Geba, which is the same as (#1368) Gibbowr --- Geber. These 'Geber' were the offspring of the influx of fallen angels as described in Genesis chapter 6, where it is stated:
Genesis 6:4 "There were giants in the earth in those days; AND ALSO AFTER THAT, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men…(#120) 'adam' and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men of renown."
One must pay strict attention in the use of pronoun and noun, verb and adverbs in this particular verse in Genesis. The use of the words "giants" and of "the sons of God" used together along with the term "mighty men" strictly implicates a realtionship in that we have these words where one describes the other and is thus not confusing the word "Geber" or "Gibbowr" with the other uses throughout scripture of just valiant or mighty warriors. Thus making these particular "Geber" which is the translation here for "mighty men" more than just "Geber" as used elsewhere in scripture to denote strong or warrior types. Used in conjunction with the term "giants" or in the Hebrew "Nphiyl," (nef-eel'); from the prime root word (#5307), "naphal," (naw-fal'); " to fall in a great variety of applications, i.e. to cast down," when used with the term, "sons of God" or "ben-elohiym, (bane-el-o-heem'), indicates the fallen angels or Nephilim, thus concluding that they in fact were of the fallen angels that "came unto the daughters of men," and produced offspring that are called the "Geber" (or 'Gibbowr #1368), here in this verse that separates the rest of the uses of the words "mighty men" throughout scripture giving them a more superiority than just a strong, valiant or warrior type person, but one also of angelic or superior being descent.It is only fitting that the 'sons of Cain' who are the progeny of satan, would 'hang out' with the 'sons of the Nephilim' AND, the sons of Canaan, the cursed son of Ham. Apparently, the Kenites found a better name and job among the 'sons of Israel'. Very advantageous and clever of them to hide among the Israelites and acquire their status and 'blessing'. Then, in Chronicles, to be listed as scribes to the priests of YHVH. Quite a leap. Followed by the rabbinic tradition holding that the daughters of the Rechabites married the sons of Levi (SOME) who were the Lord's very priests! That would easily put SOME Kenite progeny in the seat of Moses:
Matthew 23:2 "Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat…"
So…what did our Lord have to say while He walked in the flesh, concerning these sons of the devil?John 8:32 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.John 8:33 "They answered him, We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?"
The Lord is addressing the Pharisees - those who sit in Moses' seat - but not ALL the Pharisees, since not all were present at our Lord's side. Mostly, those present were out to catch Him in His Words or spy on Him for others who 'sit in the seat of Moses' as mentioned in the following passage:Luke 20:19-20 "And the chief priests and the scribes the same hour sought to lay hands on him; and they feared the people…(v. 20) And they watched him, and sent forth spies, which should feign themselves just men, that they might take hold of his words…"
So, our Lord was speaking to and in the presence of a few select men, and this next passage further defines those to whom He addresses:John 8:37 "I know that ye are Abraham's seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you."
If the Kenites wiggled their way into the camps of Israel as shown before in this study, then it would be logical that yes, intermarriage would have occurred. Therefore, it was a true statement that the sons of Cain/satan had mingled their bloodline with that of Adam/Israel. NO great feat however!Most of the children of Israel were NOT tainted with satan's seed, keep that in mind and make note of it.
Notice, Christ acknowledges that these few who taunt/bait and spy on Him are 'children of Abraham', yet the Baptist shows them (and us) how insignificant a thing this is:Matthew 3:9 "And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham."
Father doesn't need us or anyone else to do His will-He could use anything He pleases. Yet, it pleases Him to privilege us with His work, for us to grow and to appreciate and delight in His will. Christ cuts to the chase with His damning indictment of these so-called 'children of Abraham':John 8:39 "They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham."
Point number one made by our Sovereign! Followed by…John 8:40 "But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham."
Point number two scored by the Way, the Truth and the Life everlasting Himself. He shoots point blank here:John 8:41 "Ye do the deeds of your father." Make no mistake, they understood Him COMPLETELY, and were NOT ignorant of what He said. How do we know that? Look at their response! "Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God."
Their response is one that could only have been made after having understood what our Lord was implying. "Born of fornication" implies idolatry--that one is a 'bastard', not of Israel. Further, they stated that their father is GOD. If they had understood our Lord to have meant that they were only foreigners then why make the spiritual statement concerning the God of Israel, who created all creatures and therefore is the 'father of us all'?Therefore, they clearly understood that 'another' had also fathered a people. There's an old Latin expression: "Those who excuse themselves, accuse themselves". These are those 'tares' of whom our Lord spoke growing up among the wheat that were planted by the enemy Matthew 13:24-40.
Then, the Author and the Finisher of our Faith strikes the most Telling blow:John 8:42-45 "Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. You would love me…because I AM HE, of whom YOU claim to serve. (v. 43) Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. "
They chose to not understand His Word…because it would reveal them to the people.(v. 44) "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. (v. 45) And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not."
Christ gets right down where the rubber meets the road. This is Christ teaching not mine or anybody else’s. This is why it can be documented that they are Kenites. Duh, the "beginning," now, where was that? The garden of course, when the first murder was done. Who was that first murderer? ONE answer. NO multiple choices. There is only ONE and you should know. The first murderer was "Cain" and his children are Kenites. Well, isn't Jesus just speaking spiritually? ABSOLUTELY NOT! ABSOLUTELY NOT!! Have you never read the word of God? Jesus taught a parable, did you know that? And, He said; IF you do not understand this ONE parable you are NOT going to understand ANY of My parables. That parable of course, was the parable of the sower. The seed that was sown or broadcast was the word, the truth, the truth that makes you free. Our Kinsman Redeemer spends a little more time with the sons of satan:John 8:47-49 "He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God. Touché.
(v. 48) "Then answered the Jews, and said unto him, Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil?
(v. 49) Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour me."
Interestingly enough, YHVH's Only One doesn't answer their attempt to insult Him as regarding the Samaritan comment. He was after all, the Son of Man…taking upon Himself the kinship of all men. Reading the remainder of the chapter, it is clear that Christ doesn't back down from His claim of Divinity and in fact He gained steam and further badgered the bastards of satan. Not for the faint of heart. Note: the word JEWS used in the above passage implies only the location of these citizens, NOT LINEAGE. They SAID they were Jews-but how many really were of Judah's lineage or even of Israel? Christ went into much more detail about their father the devil, and how they got here on earth in the first place. In the great book ofMatthew Chapter 13. This is for you to know this is the teaching of Jesus Christ. Not some man, and not some misfit. It is the simplicity of the doctrine of Christ.
The parable of the tares sown among the wheat is so clear in its target and who the enemy is, needs little explanation:Matthew 13:24-26 "Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:
(v. 25) But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.
(v. 26) But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also."
The enemy is certainly he whose name MEANS adversary, i.e. "satan". Tares, as Bullinger comments upon in the Companion bible are: "'zewan' a grain that resembles wheat until it is full-grown. THEN, its black color reveals it among the golden wheat. Unless weeded out before harvest, the zewan will impart a bitter taste to the wheat and is said to be poisonous."
Interesting too, what our Lord says concerning what is to be done with these 'tares' - these children of satan, both those of his spiritual and physical seed:Matthew 13:29-30 "But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
(v. 30) Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn."
Continuation of the point made by God in Genesis 4:15, marked so that they are not harmed; (from v.15) "...lest any finding him should kill him."
Matthew 13:35-36. Jesus has just given the "parable of the sower" and then He speaks of the "tares" that looks just like wheat growing only they are fake. They are false. It is poisonous, "hemah," in Hebrew, and "Ios" (ee-os'); in the Greek tongue. Physically, the man who fathered them was the first murderer and liar. Clearly, this is Cain. But since Cain was satan's offspring, then the statement takes on a twofold meaning more terrible than first recognized. What are you saying about this then? Well, The "serpent seed." I heard that was a bad doctrine. WELL, Christ, Almighty God taught it! We just read it. I would be VERY careful in listening to someone that would call God a liar. Or that His teachings are a false doctrine. I would be VERY SUSPICIOUS of someone that would go against the word of God. Why? They are going to hell, where are you going?
Let’s go toMATTHEW 13:35; first, in verse 34 it speaks that He speaks in parables and that only the wise would understand.
(v.35) "That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world." Of course this "foundation" is the "Katabole," or the overthrow of satan, which, destroyed the first earth age and brought this one into being. If you are not familiar with that and if you have a Companion Bible it is in appendix 146 and will fill you in. "Been kept secret." Why? Because people would not understand. Many of you do, praise God for you.
13:36 "Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came to him, saying, declare to us the parable of the tares of the field." Not even His own disciples understood. Now listen. He is going to explain the parable He is NOT going to speak in one. He is going to explain this in such a way that a child could understand it. Let's see if you can. Do you have ears to hear?
Paul would say in 2nd Corinthians; now listen and take notes, start at the end of 2 Corinthians 11:2....."I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ."
11:3 "But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent," THE DEVIL, WHOLLY SEDUCED; "EXAPATAO," (ex-ap-at-ah'-o), "BEGUILED, Eve through his subtlety." YOU GOT THAT? What does that mean? Well, I don't know, how do you lose your virginity, friend? Christ teaches in such a way that most people can understand so did Paul. I will quote that scripture again for your documentation. 2nd Corinthians Chapter 11 verse 2 & 3.
If this were not clear enough, the Lord goes on to say it point blank for his disciples' ears:Matthew 13:37-40 "He answered and said to them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man;" In other words, the good children that God put on this earth, the races and the Adamic peoples, that God Himself created and brought them into being. (6th day "races" in: Genesis 1:26-31. AND 8th day "Adamic" in: Genesis 2:5 and then 2:15-20).
13:38 "The field is the world;" This is the world He created them in and created the beasts of the fields, in the beginning; remember, in the beginning? "The good seed are the children, of the kingdom;" OH, we are talking about people, yes we are. " But the tares are the children of the wicked one;" OHHHHHHHH, WOW! Who is THE "wicked one?" Well, let Jesus tell you so that you don't have to wonder.
13:39 "The enemy that sowed them is the devil;" Do you want to know why the other "father;” in John 8:44 is in LOWER CASE? Well, there you have it. "The harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels." (v. 40) As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world." In other words, this goes all the way to the end of the Millennium, because even the Kenites will have an opportunity if they believe and love our Father. To come out of that, wait, WHO sowed the seed? The devil, that old dragon, the serpent. Are you getting around to the "serpent seed doctrine?" Well, why wouldn't you? Why wouldn't you kind of get around to the serpent seed stuff? Well, I heard that, that is a very bad doctrine. Well you have been lied to!
Want to comment on the statement made on the "physical and spiritual seed of satan". Christians speak of the seed of Jacob being Israel. This is physical obviously. We also speak of the adoption of others grafted into Israel. These verses speak of the adoption of the gentiles engrafted into the Body of Christ:Acts 11:18; Acts 13:48; Acts 15:7-9; Acts 15:17; Acts 26:17-18….and these:
Romans 3:29 "Is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also…"
1 Corinthians 12:13 "For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit." Ephesians 3:6 "That the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel"
The point is this: We know that satan is a mimic in all he does, though his mark sets him apart and in contrast to Christ. If Israel consists of the seed and the adopted seed, then it should be clear that satan also has a seed (physical) to serve him in his 'kingdom' as 'prince of this world' as well as an adopted seed (spiritual) consisting of other races along with that portion of Jacob who have chosen satan's lot.
Not to digress…since it disturbs folks to know that in the words of our Counselor, but…Matthew 10:34-36 "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. (v. 35) For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (v. 36) And a man's foes shall be they of his OWN HOUSEHOLD."
A sword divides and knocks people off the fence. Then, the tares are more readily distinguished from the wheat. Remember, Christ said of the Laodiceans:Revelation 3:15-16 "I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. (v. 16) So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth."
The sword now present and coming will finally cause many folks to be either hot or cold…thus revealing where they really live…because words (lip service) doesn't always show the heart.Little by little we see more…and then, in Revelations, wherein lies the culmination of all the scriptures given as the final birth pang to 'push out the child', we see just where the children of satan by seed and adoption are sitting: Let's still go to one more place because you may have heard it said, “he rued us of our Brother Judah,” by letting the Kenites slip in. Go back a bit in the book of Revelation, Go to Revelation 2:9. Listen so that it will lock into your mind why this causes our Brother Judah trouble. Listen to it; this is the church of Smyrna. There were only two churches out of seven that Christ found no fault with. Are you in one of them? How do you know? Well, is it a church that teaches what they taught? ONLY those TWO CHURCHES taught who the KENITES were. If you are NOT in a church that teaches you who the Kenites are then YOU ARE IN TROUBLE FRIEND! Not my word, it is the Word of God.
REVELATION 2:9 Talking to the church of Smyrna; "I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them who say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan." Why? Because they are of their father the devil. This is not our Brother Judah. And, do they ever cause our Brother Judah a great deal of trouble. You NEED to know the difference. Or otherwise you are thrashing and wailing in the dark and knocking down your own Brother. Instead of recognizing the enemy.
2:10 "Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer. Behold, the devil will cast some of you into prison," that's when he comes as the spurious messiah, "that ye may be tried;" Why? For a witness, the Holy Spirit speaking through you, as it is written in Mark Chapter 13, "and ye shall have tribulation ten days." That is individual not as a group. "Be thou faithful to death, and I will give thee a crown of life." And of course who is death? It is satan. Be faithful against him! At the same time in closing in Revelation 3:7-9 you find again that the church of Philadelphia, "brotherly love," recognizes the Kenites as the synagogue of satan and not of our Brother Judah. So there you have the teachings of Christ. Identifying the first murderer, that is so hard for some people to figure out who the first murderer was. It just really stretches the mind. Like it might snap like a rubber band. It is so simple children can understand rather than some "apple" story. If Eve and Adam had eaten an apple, they would have made a mask of fig leaves and placed it over their mouths but they didn't they placed them over their loins. Their private parts. Do you know the truth? I don't know, you just heard it. I hope that you have eyes to see and ears to hear. And, understand that, that truth sets you free. Because you even understand what is happening in the world.
Revelation 3:7 "And to the angel of the church in PHILADELPHIA write; These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth;"
Rev 3:9 "Behold, I WILL MAKE THEM OF THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN, WHICH SAY THEY ARE JEWS, AND ARE NOT, BUT DO LIE; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee."
Only these two churches of the seven have known and taught this fact of just WHO the sons of Cain (Kenites) are and the closeness of their proximity. Paul reminds us of this fact too:Ephesians 6:11-18 "Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. (v. 12) For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, AGAINST SPIRITUAL WICKEDNESS IN HIGH PLACES. (v. 13) Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. (v. 14) Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; (v. 15) And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; (v. 16) Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. (v. 17) And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: (v. 18) Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints."
Notice, Paul emphasizes 'putting on the whole armor of God". Why? He directly targets those in 'High Places'. Indirectly, he's pointing to those of the 'synagogue of satan'. Those high places are religious seats. And who better to recognize these 'tares' other than our Lord. Yet Paul also understood, he who once sat among them and rendered them services which led to the imprisonment and death of many of our brethren.Recall what Jude said also of these of Cain, and those who followed after Cain's example, whether they be of his seed or not: Jude 1:11-13 "Woe unto them! for THEY HAVE GONE IN THE WAY OF CAIN…(v. 12) THESE ARE SPOTS IN YOUR FEASTS OF CHARITY, WHEN THEY FEAST WITH YOU, FEEDING THEMSELVES WITHOUT FEAR: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots; (v. 13) Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.
YHVH has provided discernment to us regarding His Word and the tools necessary to bring it forth.
Most historians feel Jews came to the Iberian peninsula with the Roman Legions, possibly as merchants and purveyors with a second wave of arrivals after the destruction of the second temple in 70 C.E. The first tangible evidence of a Jewish presence in Spain is found in the grave of a young Jewish girl named Salomonulla from the 3rd century C.E. found in Adra, Spain.On the other hand, legends prevalent among Spanish Jews suggested that Jews first came to Iberia after the destruction of the Temple in the 6th century B.C.E. while others date their arrival with Phoenician merchants in the 10th century B.C.E., during the King Solomon era. Participating in the surrounding Spaniards' love of lineage some Spanish Jewish families (such as Ibn Daoud, Shaltiel, Abrabanel, etc.) claim direct descent from King David. Bolstering their claims are the prophecies of Abadiah who uses the name "Sefarad" for the land that Jews exiled from Jerusalem would live in. Others claim that Tarshish of the bible was probably ancient Tartessus, a district of Southern Spain whose principal city was Gades (Cadiz).
The relatively tolerant and laissez-faire atmosphere then prevalent in the crumbling Roman Empire's province of Hispania was shattered in 409 C.E. when the Visigoths poured into Iberia from their western german homeland. These Arian Christian (see glossary) Visigoths brought with them intolerance of all non Arian-Christian minorities, ruthlessly killing and plundering for much of the three centuries they ruled Iberia. A Roman witnessing the early slaughter commented that the Iberian countryside resembled an open air morgue. Christianity was the central focus of their state and Jews in particular were mercilessly persecuted for denying Christ. What remained of the sciences and arts were denounced and abolished. Trade and culture plummeted and a dark age descended on the Iberian peninsula.
At the end of the 6th century King Reccared converted to Catholicism and made it the state religion. The Church soon became the real power behind the throne and frequently were the behind the scenes deciding factor on who would become king. In 638 C.E. the Arian Visigoths declared that "only Catholics could live in Spain",, a statement reasserted and implemented many centuries later with the expulsion of Jews in later Spain and eerily presaging Nazi Germany's stance about non Aryans (different word with different meaning).
Actively engaged in trade Spanish Jews were the main Andalusian importers-exporters of silk,leather, textiles, grain, fruit spices and cattle. Jewish travelers such as Benjamin of Tudela left records of travels even more extensive than Marco Polo's, reaching China a century before him. Communication and interchange with Jewish areas throughout the Mediterranean was profuse all the way from North Africa to Baghdad and Damascus as well as the Ashkenazi centers as evidenced by the documents found in the Cairo geniza.
The tolerant mixing of the religions in Spain was abhorrent to the Papal authorities especially after the Christians were in control of most of Iberia. By the XIV century things took a definite turn for the worse for the Jews. Periods of drought and bad crops were followed by the Black Plague which killed almost half the inhabitants of Spain and a third of the population of Europe. The Jews were accused of poisoning the wells and blamed for the plague. Jews were massacred in the thousands by religious fanatics whipped up by travelling self flagellating Catholic fanatics although this occurred less in Spain than in France and other parts of Europe. Slowly old Visigoth heritage and thinking came to the front gradually transforming Spain from the most tolerant nation in Europe into what became the one most intolerant of minorities.
--------------------
Conversos, converts to Christianity, were a mixed bag. Many were voluntary and of true conviction and often these converts became the most zealous persecutors of the Jews. Many more converted, often as a gesture otherwise meaningless to them, because it was beneficial to their careers and position in court.
Many of the conversos were extremely prominent, wealthy, governors and intermarried with the highest nobility. They could not at first believe that these actions could affect people of their calibre but they were sadly mistaken. The Inquisition, backed by the monarchy was too powerful. Accusing hundreds of fellow conversos of judaizing was encouraged by the Inquisitors as a way to possibly save oneself from the flames, thus pitting one against the other.
-----------------------------
The Inquisition
In 1492 the expulsion edict was announced. Jews had 2 months to leave Spain or embrace Catholicism. No gold or jewels could be taken out of Spain. Catholics were forbidden to receive Jewish property which was therefore confiscated by the state. Thousands of Jews were hurriedly baptized. Othersleft for North Africa, France or Portugal. Columbus started his journey within 2 days of the expulsion deadline on ships manned largely by conversos. Jewish cemeteries in Spain were ploughed under and synagogues destroyed or converted to churches or pigsties. The edict of expulsion was not repealed until Dec 1968. The limpieza de sangre racial laws excluding descendants of conversos from jobs and academies remained in force, some into the XX century with many discovering their converso ancestry only when they were refused jobs after a mandated genealogy search.
In 1497 Portugal expulsed its Jews too. Spain's and Portugal's Inquisitions spread to their colonies where many of the conversos had fled to. The Inquisition continued for 350 years into the nineteenth century. It's last victim was a woman burnt at the stake in 1821 for allegedly having sex with the devil and producing eggs that prophecised the future. Crypto Jews continued for generations in South America, Mexico, New Mexico, etc. where some are found to this day.
-------------------
The impact of Sephardic Jews were very significant wherever they settled, both culturally and in economic development. Their participation in the travels of exploration, both Spanish and Portuguese, from Christopher Colombus who may well have been a crypto Jew himself to Francisco de Albuquerque and many others was profound and their acknowledged preeminence in map making and navigating - the reasons for which are themselves a fascinating story - made them the ship navigators on most ship travels of their time, usually as "new Christians". Those that settled in Muslim lands tended to share the cultural decline of the countries they resided in. Others mostly in Holland and the New World prospered and grew to new heights. The involvement of Sephardic Jews, mostly from Morocco, in the development of the Amazon and its rubber trade is another intriguing and little known chapter in the history of these Sephardim as is the impact of Sephardic Jews in the development of Holland as a world wide banking and sea-going world power.
++++++++++++++++++++++
The Ashkenazi are East European Jews from the Khazar Empire, have Asiatic blood and suffer from a genetic disease called taysachs.
They are easily recognized by their facial features, being referred to in some corners as New York Jews or Jews of the Holocaust. Controlling the banking, media, political and commercial infrastructures of the country make them a hard nut to crack. They claim they're God's chosen people. Are they?
+++++++++++
In the 1960s, the number of Sephardim was estimated at 500,000. The Ashkenazim, at the same period, numbered about 11,000,000. Thus, in common parlance, Jew is practically synonymous with the Ashkenazi.
The Ashkenazi are the majority party in modern Israel. The two groups are always at war verbally. Most recently a Sephardim Rabbi named Yosif stated publicly the Ashkenazi are reincarnated sinners that deserved all Hitler gave them.
+++++++++++++++++++
http://www.khazaria.com/khazar-diaspora.html
The burial practices of the Khazars were transformed sometime in the 9th century. Shamanistic sun-amulets disappeared from Khazar graves after the 830s, according to Bozena Werbart, and so did other sorts of items:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What we are now going to document from the pages of history is that there are truly many today who call themselves Jews, meaning of Judah, who are in fact NOT from any of the tribes of Israel, much less from our brother Judah. What we learn from this is simply that Judah has been greatly "infiltrated" with non-Judahites who are not merely gentiles but actually the bad "seed", i.e. the "tares"! And since our purpose here is to simply document that Judah is MIXED with non-Judahites we suggest that you do an independent study on your own knowing first that the Jews of our times fall into two main divisions: the Sephardim Jews and the Askenazim Jews.
In your research you will find what has been called by some "an embarrassment to historians" and even "the most cruel hoax which history has ever perpetuated". It is the history of the powerful pagan Khazar Empire which flourished from the seventh to the eleventh century A.D. You see, history shows that the entire nation of Khazars beginning with the Kagan (akin to Kajin), their ruler, and the ruling classes were converted to Judaism!! They later migrated to Poland and Russia and formed the cradle of Western Jewry! How about that?
The following are a few short excerpts taken from the subject titled "Khazars" in the " Encyclopedia Britannica", 1973, pgs. 328-330.
KHAZARS
"... Khazar civilization shows a fairly complex texture and their religious life raises more than one problem. Christianity, Islam, Judaism and some sort of "pagan" worship are all attested by sources. About 740 the Khazar ruler - and probably the greater part of the ruling classes - were converted to Judaism. The circumstances of their conversion remain obscure, the depth of the Jewish layer difficult to assess; the fact itself is, however, undisputed and unparalleled in the history of central Eurasia.
"The story of this conversion of the Khazars had a considerable and lasting impact on the western world. The first to record it was Druthmar of Aquitaine (9th century), but circumstances of the conversion are related in greater detail in various Hebrew documents such as the so-called "Khazar Correspondence." This consists in a letter (c. 955) from the Spanish Jew Hasdai ibn Shaprut to the Khazar king and in a reply (of contested authenticity) sent by Joseph, king of the Khazars.
Most people have never heard of the Khazars or their empire which at one point "exacted tribute" from 23 nations. Of course the "seed of the serpent" has been marked with "cover-ups" ever since the fig leaves were sewn together in the garden of Eden. Hence the last two sentences of the Britannica article should come as no surprise:
"Extensive excavations brought to light the remains of the Khazar fortress Sarkel, on the lower Don, built in the 9th century with the help of Greek architects. This site, which clearly revealed the mixed character of Khazar civilization, unfortunately had to be inundatedduring the construction of the Volga-Don canal."
Concerning mamzers. Yes, God created the races for a reason, (I'll reserve commentary on that), and with the intent that they remain purebred even in the flesh. And of course you have already noted that the nations are present in the eternity. So I would say that they will be straightened out then, but actually, they are already straightened out. The host of heaven, the sons of God, already belong to their nation before they are born of the flesh. That was determined before the foundation of this earth age. Another way to look at it is that the mixing of the flesh seed does not mix the soul of the child placed in that flesh. Just as a handicapped person will restore to his perfect spiritual body, so will the mamzer restore to his nation, i.e. there will be no mamzers in the eternity. It's just in this flesh age, especially under the law, they were not permitted to lead the congregations of Israel, etc.
Also, although there has been more mixing between races in the last few generations, they are still not mixed to the degree some claim, and not that deep. The Chinese are still mostly Chinese, Irish are Irish, Germans are German, Japanese are Japanese, and Blacks are Blacks. Just remember that race has nothing to do with salvation.
It seems some would rather seek other's opinions and believe hearsay rather than go directly to the source. Nevertheless, you will find in studying Genesis all "scholars" know that the Hebrew word "adam" in Gen. 1, when used without the article and the particle means "man" as is "mankind". Mankind includes all the different races, including the Black race, who were created on the six day. Male and female created He them and gave them dominion over the fowl of the air and the fish of the sea, i.e. they were hunters and fishers, after which He pronounced them VERY GOOD, because He loves all His children and ALL the races: "yellow, black and white, they are precious in His sight."
God then rested on the seventh day and on the eighth day He said He had no man to till the ground. He then formed "eth ha adam" in chapter 2 of Genesis, meaning "this same man Adam", and his wife Eve. They would be given the duty to become the light bearers to the world, tilling and planting seeds of truth and knowledge among the nations, and they would be the parents through whom the Savior, the Light of the world, would eventually be born. He would pay the price for any and all out of ALL races to obtain salvation. We therefore all need to recognize and appreciate the creation of each and everyone of God's beautiful children and understand that all the races He created have a part in His eternal plan. He pronounced all the races Very Good and they are all pleasing to Him (Rev. 4:11), so we best be about loving each other as He loves us.
1 comment:
WOW! At first I was like this chic is nuts. But the more I read the more I was drawn into this wonderful study. I will be prinitng it out, and using it to learn more for I could feel the scales of my eyes of blindness being lifted and I wanted to say thank-you for the courage to stand alone in such affirmative boldness.
Post a Comment