UNDERSTANDING TRUTH and SPEAKING IT is not BEING Anti-Semitic nor Racist as these are only "blockades" of guerilla Deception
It’s NOT anti-Semite nor am I. ITS CHRISTIAN versus anti-Christ. PERIOD. It’s TRUTH versus DECEPTION. It's not "left" versus "right". It's CHRIST versus SATAN. It's LIBERTY versus BONDAGE. It's SOVEREIGNTY versus TYRANNY. It's FREE versus SLAVE. It's FREEDOM versus OPRESSION.
It's WE THE PEOPLE of YHVH "united" in TRUTH against all the LIES and DECEPTION of The Enemies of Christ. SO TIRED of the” blame game”, SO OVER the “name-game” which use to "divide and conquer" WE THE PEOPLE in the "assimilation into the BORG-like state of THEIR New World Order. All other “derivatives” only serve to DIVIDE. You can repeat the words that separation of church and state is in the constitution over and over, You can make up any lie and repeat it over and over, but no matter how many times you repeat a lie, it does not make it a FACT!!!!! NOW TO THE POINT of the “labeling” ERRONEOUSLY “anti-Semitic”.
Writing, criticizing, and questioning Israel and JEWS can never be anti-Semitic. Criticizing a state and people is an important check on corruption and abuse.
There are so many double standards, so much hypocrisy, over-sensitivity, and politicism in the varying definitions and labeling of anti-Semitism. Most accusations of “modern anti-Semitism” are fraudulent and abusive, used for political purposes to silence and defame opponents. These false allegations have actually led to a dramatic increase in faked anti-Semitic hate crimes.
Society’s infatuation with political correctness (PC) has spun out of control. Driven by the mainstream media OWNED BY THESE SAME ONES, champions the pseudo censorship of “PC” for political reasons, Americans have been led to believe that almost all speech, writings, and academic studies which might offend a certain race are racist. The determination of a racist statement relies on its validity and the reasonable expectation of validity by the person making the statement, not necessarily on the palatability of the audience.
If one is making a knowingly false statement to denigrate a race, then that person is making a racist statement. If however, one is making a statement that is true, but negative towards a race, then that person is not making a racist statement because the truth can never be racist nor anti-semitic..
Stereotypes are not necessarily racist either, as long as they aren’t applied to all uniformly or used unlawfully for discriminatory practices. People use stereotypes all the time to go about their lives because stereotypes are usually true. If a stereotype stopped being true, it would not longer be a stereotype. For example, men are stronger than women. Of course, not all men are stronger, but the vast majority are. It is not sexist to say this fact, nor to want to hire more men than women for a job that requires heavy lifting. To prevent women from applying however would be sexist, because some women may be strong enough to qualify. These principles also apply to anti-Semitism as well. To say that Jews are wealthier than gentiles, for example, is a factual statement, which is easily proven. It is also an age-old stereotype, but it is not anti-Semitic. Ever heard the "term" Don't Jew me out of it? Not ALL Jews are wealthier than gentiles, just as not ALL men are stronger than women, but on "average" Jews are far wealthier than gentiles.
Many may ask why anti-Semitism is so important to a gentile, who cares? As National Review columnist Joseph Sobran wrote:
The full story of [Pat Buchanan's 1996 presidential] campaign is impossible to tell as long as it’s taboo to discuss Jewish interests as freely as we discuss those of the Christian Right. Talking about American politics without mentioning the Jews is a little like talking about the NBA without mentioning the Chicago Bulls [A time when the Bulls were the most important NBA team]. Not that the Jews are all-powerful, let alone all bad. But they are successful, and therefore powerful enough: and their power is unique in being off-limits to normal criticism even when it’s highly visible. They themselves behave as if their success were a guilty secret, and they panic, and resort to accusations, as soon as the subject is raised. Jewish control of the major media in the media age makes the enforced silence both paradoxical and paralyzing. Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you. It’s a phenomenal display not of wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of furtive racial superpatriotism.
“At the core of the tragedy lies the refusal to accept that in both America and Israel, we live in an age not of Jewish weakness, but of Jewish power, and that without moral vigilance, Jews will abuse power just as hideously as anyone else. American Jewish organizations do not deny that Jews wield power; privately, they exult in it. Emotionally, power is what groups like AIPAC sell: the power to be a modern-day Esther, whispering in the ear of the king…”
It is dangerous when a powerful group will not admit its power, and therefore has no culpability. And, as Beinart professed, Jewish Americans have certainly become powerful. Although Jews comprise only 2% of the population, 10.25% of all of America’s millionaires, 36% of its billionaires, and 45% of the top 40 richest Americans are Jewish. Jews hold the two top Federal Reserve positions—Chairmen Ben Shalom Bernanke and Vice Chairwoman Janet Yellen. The majority of the Federal Reserve District Bank Presidents are also Jews, and so was the previous Chairmen of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan. The Securities and Exchange Commission Chairwoman Mary Shapiro is Jewish, as well as the Commissioner of IRS, Douglas Schulman. In addition, 33% of the Supreme Court Justices—Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg— are Jewish. The majority of the media is also either owned or operated by Jewish Americans. And 80% of the Ivy League top administrative positions are held by Jews or spouses of Jews.
In 2003, the Washington Post estimated that Jewish Americans contributed 60% of the Democratic Party’s funding. It is widely estimated that Jewish Americans contribute 50% of the total campaign contributions in America. Not a shocking statistic considering that just one Jewish special interest donor, Sheldon Adelson, contributed almost $100 million during the 2012 election cycle. In addition, the main Jewish lobby, American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), is the only foreign lobby in America that is allowed to go unregistered, despite getting caught spying on America for Israel in 2005. AIPAC has had almost every major politician over the last three decades attend its annual conference on more than one occasion. As a result of AIPAC’s efforts, most major presidential candidates now visit Israel before running for the Presidency. When AIPAC asks Congress to sign a position letter, most do. No other lobby in American history has had even a shred of that kind of power.
There is significant evidence that this power has been used for discriminatory hiring, inequitable college admissions, biased media coverage, and tribalistic government appointments. And to make matters worse, false allegations of anti-Semitism have been leveled to cover up this discrimination. Often, innocent civil rights activists, academics, and honest journalists are destroyed in the process.
Jewish leaders claim that singling out Israel for criticism is anti-Semitic. But what a foolish argument to make. … For one, trillions of dollars of American tax dollars have gone to Israel over the last half-century. Americans are funding Israel and providing the nation with military equipment, which is used to kill Palestinians. Therefore, Americans are complicit in any war crimes … Israel has stolen American technology and equipment, spied on America, and even attacked the nation in the past (Lavon Affair and USS Liberty). America’s relationship with Israel damages America’s world standing, and this fact should concern every American.
Jewish Involvement In The African Slave Trade
Claiming that Jews engaged in, or even dominated the African slave trade is not anti-Semitic. Droves of Jewish historians have written on the subject. Compiling quotes from these Jewish historians and re-publishing them in one consolidated book, as Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan did in the book The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, is certainly not anti-Semitic. Prior to Farrakhan’s book, most Jews maintained that they had almost no role in the African slave trade. When the publication of Farrakhan’s book made this position untenable, these same Jewish leaders claimed that the Jewish role was negligible. Now, they claim that the Jewish role was not disproportionate to white Europeans, and all who claim otherwise are anti-Semitic. Just the fact that these Jewish leaders have changed their position so many times is evidence of uncertainty and historical/academic dishonesty. Therefore, other historical opinions should be welcomed.
In Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History, prominent Jewish Historian Marc Raphael wrote,
“Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French, British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated. This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the triangular slave trade that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses….”
Jewish historical records show that Jewish involvement in the North American slave trade was so dominant that slave posts were frequently closed on Jewish holidays. Arnold Wiznitzer, a Jewish historian, wrote, “the buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of their lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed.” In The United States Jewry 1776-1985 Jacob Marcus wrote, “all through the eighteenth century, into the early nineteenth century, Jews in the North were to own black servants. In 1820 over 75% of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond, and Savannah owned slaves. Almost 40% of all Jewish householders in the United States owned one slave or more.” In the South, which had a much higher ratio of slave ownership than the North, only 5% of white people owned slaves.
White Europeans may have ended the morally corrupt practice of slavery in North America much sooner if it weren’t for powerful Jewish businessmen lobbying to keep their profitable industry alive. As Rabbi and historian, Bertram Korn said, “many Southern Jews believed slavery to be indispensable to their happiness and security. The road to social and economic advancement and acceptance [for the Jews] was made easier by the institution of slavery. And I emphatically add here through the "institution" of slavery was abolished. SLAVERY through USURY and the 14th ammendment to OUR CONSTITUTION only served to MAKE SLAVES OF EVERY person on this land...The Great American ZIONIST Plantation!
Jews Are Not Semitic
Writing that Jews are not Semitic is not anti-Semitism. Many Jews have written on the subject, and quite convincingly. A Jewish historian, Arthur Koestler, researched the history of the Ashkenazi Jews and published a book titled The Thirteenth Tribe, which concluded that most modern day Jews’ origins were just north of Turkey. KEEP READING THIS and get an in depth explanation.
The Israel Lobby Controls US Foreign Policy
Making a statement such as “the Israel lobby controls US foreign policy” is not anti-Semitic. These sentiments have been articulated by many Jews in the past and have credible evidence to support them, including admissions by the chief Israel lobby in America, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). The former President of AIPAC, David Steiner, was actually caught on tape admitting as much. When AIPAC sends a letter demanding that Congressmen support a particular position, most immediately sign it. Almost every major US politician over the last 3 decades has attended the annual AIPAC conference on more than one occasion, and AIPAC’s own website even used to boast about how many pieces of legislation it was responsible for.
In 1997, Fortune magazine called AIPAC the second most powerful lobby in America. Since that time AIPAC’s star has risen steadily, and is now widely regarded as the most powerful lobby in the world. Newt Gingrich said, “AIPAC is the most effective general interest group….. across the entire planet.” Jeffrey Goldberg said, “AIPAC is a leviathan among lobbies.” According to Senator Fritz Hollings,”You can’t have an Israel policy other than what AIPAC gives you around here [Capitol Hill].
Sources of United States Oil in 2009
America’s heavy involvement in the Middle East alone should provide enough credence to make the statement: “The Israel lobby controls US foreign policy.” Most Americans believe that America intervenes in the Middle East because of oil, but that is completely untrue. The US gets a minor amount of its oil from the Middle East. About half of America’s oil is produced in the US, and the vast majority of the rest comes from Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, and Nigeria.
In reality, the US could guarantee its oil reserves by simply investing in a Canadian pipeline and securing long-term oil contracts with Canadian producers. The cost would have been about a thousandth of the expenditure of America’s Middle Eastern adventurism and foreign aid over the last decade. America is involved in the Middle East for only one reason, and it isn’t oil. Wonder why there is no Keystone Pipeline??????????????
At worst, claiming that the Israel lobby control American foreign policy is simply a matter of perspective. Given the evidence, there is no way the claim could be considered anti-Semitic. If anything, claiming that gentiles control America’s foreign policy is anti-gentile because it lodges full responsibility for America’s catastrophic foreign policy, and the murder of a million Iraqis and Afghans on the shoulders of gentiles, when all evidence suggests otherwise.
Jews Control The Media, Finance, Etc…
Claiming that one particular racial or religious group controls an industry is not racist. Take the media for example, Joel Stein and many other Jews have written about how Hollywood is a “Jewish town” and even that “Jews totally run Hollywood.” The fact is that most major media executives are in fact Jewish. This is a provable fact. Suggesting that Jews do not control the media is anti-gentile because it is a de facto claim that gentiles control the media, which is clearly false. Calling people anti-Semitic for claiming that Jews control the media crushes discourse on potential anti-gentile racism in the media.
This anti-gentile racism is prevalent in many other fields of Jewish overrepresentation, such as professional sports management and the Ivy League. Jews or those married to Jews hold 80% of the top spots in the Ivy League, and they are admitting Jewish students at a 7-15 times disproportionate rate to their proportion of the population, which according to professor Kevin McDonald, can only be explained by racist admissions policies.
In finance, as mentioned above, Jews hold the most important jobs in the land, which control the printing of America’s money, the collecting of the taxes, and the regulation and oversight of the most important financial matters in the nation. They also account for a large percentage of wealthy Americans, even though they only comprise 2% of the entire population. This could very reasonably lead a person to conclude that Jews control American finance. To say that WASP’s or gentiles control American finance, as many claim, is certainly anti-gentile racism.
Discussing the Jewish Lobby
While many find it distasteful to discuss the “Jewish lobby,” it is by no means anti-Semitic. The fact is that Jews are the most cohesive and powerful political group in America, and they often find themselves lobbying for the same policy objectives. For example, the vast majority of politically active American Jews have supported/lobbied for Israel, gun control, and Obamacare. In the case of Obamacare, 13 of 13 Jewish Senators, 25 of 26 Jewish Representatives, and 3 of 3 US Supreme Court Justices voted for the unconstitutional legislation. These Jewish politicians and justices carried the day for Obamacare in the Senate, House, and Supreme Court. As for gun control, almost every single piece of gun legislation in the last 5 decades has been sponsored or co-sponsored by Jewish Congressmen.
The Jewish Israel lobby is widely regarded as the most powerful lobby in America, as discussed above. Even the Jewish Journal writes, ”[confusing] AIPAC with the Jewish lobby… is a distinction with barely a difference….dinners at AIPAC are Kosher…. kippot are worn by many in the audience….there are many rabbis in the room. Many synagogues send delegations of members, as does mine, led by our rabbi and synagogue president. Participation in AIPAC is considered normative Jewish behavior, but still we want to maintain that AIPAC is not a Jewish lobby.”
The Jewish author goes on to claim that there are in fact exclusively Jewish organizations lobbying US politicians for Jewish interests,
“How then to deal with the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, which is a registered lobby and not a tax exempt organization? This surely cannot be regarded solely as a pro-Israel lobby. Its agenda is larger than Israel and it conceives of itself as representing Jewish interest world-wide. When I served three decades ago as Executive Director of the Jewish Community Council of Greater Washington, we had a monthly meeting of representatives of national Jewish organizations who had offices in Washington, to share information and coordinate strategies for defending common Jewish interests on Capitol Hill and at the White House. We were not ashamed to see ourselves as part of a Jewish lobby, as part of an expression of Jewish power in a complex political system.”
If Jewish lobbyists openly admit that there is in fact a Jewish lobby, and it is quite powerful, then how can it be anti-Semitic for a gentile to claim as much?
Fraudulent Estimations of Modern Anti-Semitism
The anti-Defamation League often takes surveys to determine a population’s anti-Semitism. These surveys are ridden with tainted questions that are in many cases true, or matters of opinion. When a respondent answers the ADL questions in the affirmative, they are labeled anti-Semitic. For example, asking a person if Jews are more loyal to Israel than America is a matter of perspective. There are more than a few prominent Jews who have openly admitted that their loyalty to Israel is far greater than their loyalty to America. In addition, more than 100,000 Americans belong to a foreign lobby (AIPAC), which has been caught spying on America for Israel, and actively campaigns to give American tax dollars to Israel. This is just one of many Israel lobbies in America. Are most Jews more loyal to Israel? Probably not, but since some Jews readily admit that they are, and when the lobbying gets taken into consideration, then it no longer becomes anti-Semitic to answer this question in the affirmative.
Other questions include: “Do Jews have too much power in the US” and “Do Jews have too much influence on Wall Street?” Well, just as Jewish activists would rail against discriminatory and inequitable practices if 2% of the white gentile population held the most important financial positions in the land, so too can gentile activists discuss Jewish overrepresentation. In fact, many Jews were prominent in the civil rights movement, which openly challenged white overrepresentation.
Jewish leaders have proven that they can no longer be trusted to unilaterally determine nor define anti-Semitism. As the Jewish publication Daily Beast wrote,
“I think it is time to acknowledge, bluntly, that certain major Jewish organizations, indeed, the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations—also, the ADL, AIPAC, the American Jewish Committee, political groups like the Republican Jewish Coalition, along with their various columnists, pundits, and list-serves—are among the most consistent purveyors of McCarthyite-style outrages in America today. Are there greater serial defamers of public officials in fake campaigns against defamation?”
Common sense needs to be brought into the discussion before more Americans are falsely accused and destroyed for their free speech. When matters of prospective or truthful statements can be seen as anti-Semitic, and punished severely, then citizens have no free speech.
Semites are the descendants of Shem and the only way you can make it mean something else is by concocting your own biases and trying to make it so by repeating them over and over and drinking the proverbial Kool-Aid.By calling this post and me “anti-Semitic” YOU show your own “biases and ignorance”. If you say JEWS are descendants of Shem, then PROVE they are “descendants” of SHEM.
The word Semite comes from Noah's son Shem. Those who call themselves "Jews" assert that THEY are descendants of Shem. The Jews only “become” descendants when CHRISTIANS toss around verbiage of anti-Semitism when they are EXPOSED for being NOT OF ISRAEL and having landed in our BRANCHES of Government and all the HIGH SEATS today in like manner as they did IN JESUS’S TIME in the seats of The Sadducees, and The Pharisees THEN. Did Christ NOT say PUBLICALLY “YOU are OF your father the Devil and the DEEDS of your father you do? John 8:44. THESE SAME ILK have been EXPULSED from country after country for THEIR TRYING TO CONTROL . Look at OUR NATION TODAY.
Not all of Shem's descendants became Israelites, in fact the over whelming percent of Shem's descendants are NOT Israelites. Furthermore most of the descendants of Shem became the enemies who fought against the Israelites. Only a tiny fraction of Abraham's descendants became Israelites. Abraham had 10 sons with 3 wives (Sarah, Hagar and Keturah). Abraham has about 30 grandsons (all descendants of Shem and Eber) and only 1/30th was the father of the Israelites. All the rest of the Hebrew / Semitic grandchildren produced non Israelite descendants.
Anti-Semitism'—that's a 'dirty' word today. Anyone who indulges in it is a terrible person! It's a word to stop all criticism of a certain group. One must never be 'Anti-Semitic.' One can talk about a variety of subjects, in fact all subjects, but one must never talk against the 'Semites,' whoever they are! But here is a strange thing—no one really knows what 'Anti-Semitism' is. Do you know? Well, let us look at the word.
There is not much doubt about the word 'Anti.' It means "opposed to" or "against." One could be 'Anti-pornography,' which means that one is against pornography, and one could be 'Anti-abortion,' which means that one is against abortion. 'Anti-America' means to be against the country of America. Thus we can all agree that 'Anti' means 'against' but 'Semitism' is a different matter so let us examine it.
The word 'Semitism' comes from the name of a character in the Bible, whose name was Shem. If you will remember, Noah had three sons who were named Ham, Shem and Japheth. Those that came from Ham were called 'Hamites,' those that came from Shem were called 'Shemites,' or 'Semites,' and those descended from Japheth were called 'Japhethites.' Therefore anyone who is against the descendants of Shem, would be 'Anti-Semite.' Is that so? Well, let us follow it out a little further.
A great-grandson of Shem was named Eber or Heber, (see Genesis 11:14). Heber had descendants who were called 'Hebrews,' and his most notable descendant was a man named Abram, who was called a 'Hebrew' (see Genesis 14:13). The descendants of Abram (or Abraham, as he was later renamed) were called Hebrews, especially when the Children of Israel were in Egypt, and the Egyptians called them by that name, 'Hebrews.' Remember, all the descendants of Abraham were, and are, Hebrews.
Abraham had two sons (not counting those of Keturah). The firstborn son was named Ishmael, his mother was Hagar, an Egyptian. Because Ishmael was the son of Abraham's concubine, he was not given the blessings which were promised to Abraham, but was to head up a different race of people, namely the Arabs of today. Thus the Arabs are also a Semitic people because they came from Shem, the Son of Noah. As the Arabs are Semitic, then it follows that anyone who is against the Arabs would seem to be 'Anti-Semitic.'
So from this deduction and definition, if the Jews today are fighting the Arabs, the Jews are 'Anti-Semitic,' because the Arabs are Semites. Abraham's other son was Isaac, which meant Isaac was also a Hebrew, because Abraham was a Hebrew as well as a Semite, because he was descended from Shem. Therefore all the descendants of Isaac would be Hebrews and Semites.
Isaac had twin sons, one was named Esau, and the other Jacob. Like their father, they were both Hebrews and Semites, as would be all of their descendants. Later Esau's name was changed to Edom (means "Red"). Isaac's other son was named Jacob, which means a "supplanter," because when the twins were born, Jacob grabbed his brother's heel and tried to be born first. When Jacob grew up and took wives, he had twelve sons. After an experience with the Lord, Jacob's name was changed to Israel, and the descendants of his twelve sons were called, the "Children of Israel." Because Jacob was their father, these twelve sons were Israelites as well as Semites. Thus today, wherever the descendants of these twelve sons are, they are Hebrew, Semites and Israelites.
It happened that the twelve sons of Jacob-Israel developed into a strong kingdom, which at one time was ruled over by King Solomon. However, after his death the kingdom was divided into the ten-tribed, "House of Israel," and the two-tribed (Judah and Benjamin) "House of Judah." In 721 B.C., the House of Israel with many (around 250,000) from the House of Judah were carried into Assyrian captivity. In 586 B.C. the balance of Judah, with Benjamin, were taken into Babylonian captivity by King Nebuchadnezzer. After a period of 70 years, certain of the House of Judah returned to the "Land" under Ezra and Nehemiah and were from then on known as 'Jews' (the more correct term should be 'Judeans' as the noun 'Jew' did not exist at that time in history. Etymology of the word Jew: Middle English, from Old French gyu, from Latin Judaeus, from Greek Ioudaios, from Hebrew Yehudhi, fromYehudhah—Judah.—Merriam Webster Dictionary). At this point in time, in disobedience to the commandments of God, who forbade mixed marriages, they intermarried with the 'people of the land,' who were Edomites, Hittites, Canaanites, and so on. This caused Ezra great distress, and he called upon them to repent (see Ezra 9:1-2).
These 'Jews' that came back from Babylon not only had intermixed with the 'people of the land,' but also brought back the religion of Babylon with them, which is contained in the "Babylonian Talmud." These were called the 'traditions' and were the accumulated writings of the rabbis and other Jewish leaders. It was these 'Jews' that were in the land when Jesus came, and they disputed with Him on spiritual and moral questions. Ethnically they were part "Israel" and partly "Esau" because of their intermarriages. In Jesus' time, the ruler was Herod and he was an Edomite, being descended from Esau. Esau had intermarried with the Canaanites, and so these "Jews" were in reality a 'mixed race.' Also, in the time of Esther, "Many people of the land [Persia] became Jews, for fear of the Jews"! (See Esther 8:17).
Those of the Tribe of Benjamin that accompanied Judah, settled in Galilee, and became known as the Galileans. They were both Israelites and Hebrews, as well as being Semites. At a later date when Jerusalem was besieged, they escaped, wandered across Europe, and some became known as the "Normans," who finally entered into the British Isles in A.D. 1066 at the Battle of Hastings. The Normans, therefore, are Semitic, Hebrews, and are lost Israelites!
The Jews rejected Jesus as the Messiah or Christ (a transliteration—an adjective, not a noun), and were scattered after the fall of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, wandering from one country to another, many times being driven out of countries due to their way of life, and their attempts to control the countries. As the Arabs have opposed the Jews, the Arabs could not be classed as 'Anti-Semitic' because the Jews are Semites; instead they could be called "Anti-Jewish," because they are against the Jews. They are not against all of the other descendants of Shem!
The Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and kindred people that are the descendants of the 'lost Tribes of Israel,' could not be called 'Anti-Semitic,' because they are Semites, through Abraham, Isaac, Jacob-Israel and their descendants. Remember, the Arabs and kindred people are Semitic; the people of Northern Europe who are Celtic, Anglo-Saxons or kindred people are Semites; the founding fathers of the United states, and the Caucasian people of that nation are Semitic, and therefore cannot be accused of being 'Anti-Semitic.'
Those opposed to the 'Jews' should be called 'Anti-Jewish,' not 'Anti-Semitic.'
After being driven out of Asia, the Khazars, a Turko-Mongolian people settled north of the Caspian Sea. Having a spoken language, but not a written one and no religion, in A.D. 740, the Khazars adopted the Jewish religion. These Khazars were the descendants of Japheth, the son of Noah, from their ancestor Ashkenaz, who was a grandson of Japheth (see Genesis 10:1-3). The Khazars were later to be known as 'Ashkenazim Jews,' and subsequently settled in places such as Poland and Western Russia. They adopted the Hebrew characters for their language which is known today as 'Yiddish.' (Arthur) Koestler, a Jewish historian, tells in his book The Thirteenth Tribe, about the Khazars becoming Jews. Nowhere does he state that the Ashkenazim Jews are descendants of Israel. The Jews today, who protest the loudest about 'Anti-Semitism,' are not even Semites themselves, but are Japhethites. Today, about 90 per cent of the Jews are in reality 'Ashkenazim (Khazar) Jews,' and many of the people who make up the nation of 'Israel(i)' are really the Ashkenazim-Khazar Jews! The people who are being accused of 'Anti-Semitism,' like the Arabs, and some of the Celto-Anglo-Saxon-Israel people are the real 'Semites.'
Very few of the present day Jews follow the Old Testament teachings, but rather, follow the Babylonian Talmud instead. 'Anti-Semitism' is the cry that Jews raise today in order to stop people from investigating the Jewish incursion into the affairs of nations. Let us be clear about the meaning of the words we use. Truth helps to bring understanding and reconciliation between honest people and people of good faith.
It's WE THE PEOPLE of YHVH "united" in TRUTH against all the LIES and DECEPTION of The Enemies of Christ. SO TIRED of the” blame game”, SO OVER the “name-game” which use to "divide and conquer" WE THE PEOPLE in the "assimilation into the BORG-like state of THEIR New World Order. All other “derivatives” only serve to DIVIDE. You can repeat the words that separation of church and state is in the constitution over and over, You can make up any lie and repeat it over and over, but no matter how many times you repeat a lie, it does not make it a FACT!!!!! NOW TO THE POINT of the “labeling” ERRONEOUSLY “anti-Semitic”.
Writing, criticizing, and questioning Israel and JEWS can never be anti-Semitic. Criticizing a state and people is an important check on corruption and abuse.
There are so many double standards, so much hypocrisy, over-sensitivity, and politicism in the varying definitions and labeling of anti-Semitism. Most accusations of “modern anti-Semitism” are fraudulent and abusive, used for political purposes to silence and defame opponents. These false allegations have actually led to a dramatic increase in faked anti-Semitic hate crimes.
Society’s infatuation with political correctness (PC) has spun out of control. Driven by the mainstream media OWNED BY THESE SAME ONES, champions the pseudo censorship of “PC” for political reasons, Americans have been led to believe that almost all speech, writings, and academic studies which might offend a certain race are racist. The determination of a racist statement relies on its validity and the reasonable expectation of validity by the person making the statement, not necessarily on the palatability of the audience.
If one is making a knowingly false statement to denigrate a race, then that person is making a racist statement. If however, one is making a statement that is true, but negative towards a race, then that person is not making a racist statement because the truth can never be racist nor anti-semitic..
Stereotypes are not necessarily racist either, as long as they aren’t applied to all uniformly or used unlawfully for discriminatory practices. People use stereotypes all the time to go about their lives because stereotypes are usually true. If a stereotype stopped being true, it would not longer be a stereotype. For example, men are stronger than women. Of course, not all men are stronger, but the vast majority are. It is not sexist to say this fact, nor to want to hire more men than women for a job that requires heavy lifting. To prevent women from applying however would be sexist, because some women may be strong enough to qualify. These principles also apply to anti-Semitism as well. To say that Jews are wealthier than gentiles, for example, is a factual statement, which is easily proven. It is also an age-old stereotype, but it is not anti-Semitic. Ever heard the "term" Don't Jew me out of it? Not ALL Jews are wealthier than gentiles, just as not ALL men are stronger than women, but on "average" Jews are far wealthier than gentiles.
Many may ask why anti-Semitism is so important to a gentile, who cares? As National Review columnist Joseph Sobran wrote:
The full story of [Pat Buchanan's 1996 presidential] campaign is impossible to tell as long as it’s taboo to discuss Jewish interests as freely as we discuss those of the Christian Right. Talking about American politics without mentioning the Jews is a little like talking about the NBA without mentioning the Chicago Bulls [A time when the Bulls were the most important NBA team]. Not that the Jews are all-powerful, let alone all bad. But they are successful, and therefore powerful enough: and their power is unique in being off-limits to normal criticism even when it’s highly visible. They themselves behave as if their success were a guilty secret, and they panic, and resort to accusations, as soon as the subject is raised. Jewish control of the major media in the media age makes the enforced silence both paradoxical and paralyzing. Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you. It’s a phenomenal display not of wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of furtive racial superpatriotism.
“At the core of the tragedy lies the refusal to accept that in both America and Israel, we live in an age not of Jewish weakness, but of Jewish power, and that without moral vigilance, Jews will abuse power just as hideously as anyone else. American Jewish organizations do not deny that Jews wield power; privately, they exult in it. Emotionally, power is what groups like AIPAC sell: the power to be a modern-day Esther, whispering in the ear of the king…”
It is dangerous when a powerful group will not admit its power, and therefore has no culpability. And, as Beinart professed, Jewish Americans have certainly become powerful. Although Jews comprise only 2% of the population, 10.25% of all of America’s millionaires, 36% of its billionaires, and 45% of the top 40 richest Americans are Jewish. Jews hold the two top Federal Reserve positions—Chairmen Ben Shalom Bernanke and Vice Chairwoman Janet Yellen. The majority of the Federal Reserve District Bank Presidents are also Jews, and so was the previous Chairmen of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan. The Securities and Exchange Commission Chairwoman Mary Shapiro is Jewish, as well as the Commissioner of IRS, Douglas Schulman. In addition, 33% of the Supreme Court Justices—Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg— are Jewish. The majority of the media is also either owned or operated by Jewish Americans. And 80% of the Ivy League top administrative positions are held by Jews or spouses of Jews.
In 2003, the Washington Post estimated that Jewish Americans contributed 60% of the Democratic Party’s funding. It is widely estimated that Jewish Americans contribute 50% of the total campaign contributions in America. Not a shocking statistic considering that just one Jewish special interest donor, Sheldon Adelson, contributed almost $100 million during the 2012 election cycle. In addition, the main Jewish lobby, American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), is the only foreign lobby in America that is allowed to go unregistered, despite getting caught spying on America for Israel in 2005. AIPAC has had almost every major politician over the last three decades attend its annual conference on more than one occasion. As a result of AIPAC’s efforts, most major presidential candidates now visit Israel before running for the Presidency. When AIPAC asks Congress to sign a position letter, most do. No other lobby in American history has had even a shred of that kind of power.
There is significant evidence that this power has been used for discriminatory hiring, inequitable college admissions, biased media coverage, and tribalistic government appointments. And to make matters worse, false allegations of anti-Semitism have been leveled to cover up this discrimination. Often, innocent civil rights activists, academics, and honest journalists are destroyed in the process.
Jewish leaders claim that singling out Israel for criticism is anti-Semitic. But what a foolish argument to make. … For one, trillions of dollars of American tax dollars have gone to Israel over the last half-century. Americans are funding Israel and providing the nation with military equipment, which is used to kill Palestinians. Therefore, Americans are complicit in any war crimes … Israel has stolen American technology and equipment, spied on America, and even attacked the nation in the past (Lavon Affair and USS Liberty). America’s relationship with Israel damages America’s world standing, and this fact should concern every American.
Jewish Involvement In The African Slave Trade
Claiming that Jews engaged in, or even dominated the African slave trade is not anti-Semitic. Droves of Jewish historians have written on the subject. Compiling quotes from these Jewish historians and re-publishing them in one consolidated book, as Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan did in the book The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, is certainly not anti-Semitic. Prior to Farrakhan’s book, most Jews maintained that they had almost no role in the African slave trade. When the publication of Farrakhan’s book made this position untenable, these same Jewish leaders claimed that the Jewish role was negligible. Now, they claim that the Jewish role was not disproportionate to white Europeans, and all who claim otherwise are anti-Semitic. Just the fact that these Jewish leaders have changed their position so many times is evidence of uncertainty and historical/academic dishonesty. Therefore, other historical opinions should be welcomed.
In Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History, prominent Jewish Historian Marc Raphael wrote,
“Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French, British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated. This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the triangular slave trade that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses….”
Jewish historical records show that Jewish involvement in the North American slave trade was so dominant that slave posts were frequently closed on Jewish holidays. Arnold Wiznitzer, a Jewish historian, wrote, “the buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of their lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed.” In The United States Jewry 1776-1985 Jacob Marcus wrote, “all through the eighteenth century, into the early nineteenth century, Jews in the North were to own black servants. In 1820 over 75% of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond, and Savannah owned slaves. Almost 40% of all Jewish householders in the United States owned one slave or more.” In the South, which had a much higher ratio of slave ownership than the North, only 5% of white people owned slaves.
White Europeans may have ended the morally corrupt practice of slavery in North America much sooner if it weren’t for powerful Jewish businessmen lobbying to keep their profitable industry alive. As Rabbi and historian, Bertram Korn said, “many Southern Jews believed slavery to be indispensable to their happiness and security. The road to social and economic advancement and acceptance [for the Jews] was made easier by the institution of slavery. And I emphatically add here through the "institution" of slavery was abolished. SLAVERY through USURY and the 14th ammendment to OUR CONSTITUTION only served to MAKE SLAVES OF EVERY person on this land...The Great American ZIONIST Plantation!
Jews Are Not Semitic
Writing that Jews are not Semitic is not anti-Semitism. Many Jews have written on the subject, and quite convincingly. A Jewish historian, Arthur Koestler, researched the history of the Ashkenazi Jews and published a book titled The Thirteenth Tribe, which concluded that most modern day Jews’ origins were just north of Turkey. KEEP READING THIS and get an in depth explanation.
The Israel Lobby Controls US Foreign Policy
Making a statement such as “the Israel lobby controls US foreign policy” is not anti-Semitic. These sentiments have been articulated by many Jews in the past and have credible evidence to support them, including admissions by the chief Israel lobby in America, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). The former President of AIPAC, David Steiner, was actually caught on tape admitting as much. When AIPAC sends a letter demanding that Congressmen support a particular position, most immediately sign it. Almost every major US politician over the last 3 decades has attended the annual AIPAC conference on more than one occasion, and AIPAC’s own website even used to boast about how many pieces of legislation it was responsible for.
In 1997, Fortune magazine called AIPAC the second most powerful lobby in America. Since that time AIPAC’s star has risen steadily, and is now widely regarded as the most powerful lobby in the world. Newt Gingrich said, “AIPAC is the most effective general interest group….. across the entire planet.” Jeffrey Goldberg said, “AIPAC is a leviathan among lobbies.” According to Senator Fritz Hollings,”You can’t have an Israel policy other than what AIPAC gives you around here [Capitol Hill].
Sources of United States Oil in 2009
America’s heavy involvement in the Middle East alone should provide enough credence to make the statement: “The Israel lobby controls US foreign policy.” Most Americans believe that America intervenes in the Middle East because of oil, but that is completely untrue. The US gets a minor amount of its oil from the Middle East. About half of America’s oil is produced in the US, and the vast majority of the rest comes from Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, and Nigeria.
In reality, the US could guarantee its oil reserves by simply investing in a Canadian pipeline and securing long-term oil contracts with Canadian producers. The cost would have been about a thousandth of the expenditure of America’s Middle Eastern adventurism and foreign aid over the last decade. America is involved in the Middle East for only one reason, and it isn’t oil. Wonder why there is no Keystone Pipeline??????????????
At worst, claiming that the Israel lobby control American foreign policy is simply a matter of perspective. Given the evidence, there is no way the claim could be considered anti-Semitic. If anything, claiming that gentiles control America’s foreign policy is anti-gentile because it lodges full responsibility for America’s catastrophic foreign policy, and the murder of a million Iraqis and Afghans on the shoulders of gentiles, when all evidence suggests otherwise.
Jews Control The Media, Finance, Etc…
Claiming that one particular racial or religious group controls an industry is not racist. Take the media for example, Joel Stein and many other Jews have written about how Hollywood is a “Jewish town” and even that “Jews totally run Hollywood.” The fact is that most major media executives are in fact Jewish. This is a provable fact. Suggesting that Jews do not control the media is anti-gentile because it is a de facto claim that gentiles control the media, which is clearly false. Calling people anti-Semitic for claiming that Jews control the media crushes discourse on potential anti-gentile racism in the media.
This anti-gentile racism is prevalent in many other fields of Jewish overrepresentation, such as professional sports management and the Ivy League. Jews or those married to Jews hold 80% of the top spots in the Ivy League, and they are admitting Jewish students at a 7-15 times disproportionate rate to their proportion of the population, which according to professor Kevin McDonald, can only be explained by racist admissions policies.
In finance, as mentioned above, Jews hold the most important jobs in the land, which control the printing of America’s money, the collecting of the taxes, and the regulation and oversight of the most important financial matters in the nation. They also account for a large percentage of wealthy Americans, even though they only comprise 2% of the entire population. This could very reasonably lead a person to conclude that Jews control American finance. To say that WASP’s or gentiles control American finance, as many claim, is certainly anti-gentile racism.
Discussing the Jewish Lobby
While many find it distasteful to discuss the “Jewish lobby,” it is by no means anti-Semitic. The fact is that Jews are the most cohesive and powerful political group in America, and they often find themselves lobbying for the same policy objectives. For example, the vast majority of politically active American Jews have supported/lobbied for Israel, gun control, and Obamacare. In the case of Obamacare, 13 of 13 Jewish Senators, 25 of 26 Jewish Representatives, and 3 of 3 US Supreme Court Justices voted for the unconstitutional legislation. These Jewish politicians and justices carried the day for Obamacare in the Senate, House, and Supreme Court. As for gun control, almost every single piece of gun legislation in the last 5 decades has been sponsored or co-sponsored by Jewish Congressmen.
The Jewish Israel lobby is widely regarded as the most powerful lobby in America, as discussed above. Even the Jewish Journal writes, ”[confusing] AIPAC with the Jewish lobby… is a distinction with barely a difference….dinners at AIPAC are Kosher…. kippot are worn by many in the audience….there are many rabbis in the room. Many synagogues send delegations of members, as does mine, led by our rabbi and synagogue president. Participation in AIPAC is considered normative Jewish behavior, but still we want to maintain that AIPAC is not a Jewish lobby.”
The Jewish author goes on to claim that there are in fact exclusively Jewish organizations lobbying US politicians for Jewish interests,
“How then to deal with the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, which is a registered lobby and not a tax exempt organization? This surely cannot be regarded solely as a pro-Israel lobby. Its agenda is larger than Israel and it conceives of itself as representing Jewish interest world-wide. When I served three decades ago as Executive Director of the Jewish Community Council of Greater Washington, we had a monthly meeting of representatives of national Jewish organizations who had offices in Washington, to share information and coordinate strategies for defending common Jewish interests on Capitol Hill and at the White House. We were not ashamed to see ourselves as part of a Jewish lobby, as part of an expression of Jewish power in a complex political system.”
If Jewish lobbyists openly admit that there is in fact a Jewish lobby, and it is quite powerful, then how can it be anti-Semitic for a gentile to claim as much?
Fraudulent Estimations of Modern Anti-Semitism
The anti-Defamation League often takes surveys to determine a population’s anti-Semitism. These surveys are ridden with tainted questions that are in many cases true, or matters of opinion. When a respondent answers the ADL questions in the affirmative, they are labeled anti-Semitic. For example, asking a person if Jews are more loyal to Israel than America is a matter of perspective. There are more than a few prominent Jews who have openly admitted that their loyalty to Israel is far greater than their loyalty to America. In addition, more than 100,000 Americans belong to a foreign lobby (AIPAC), which has been caught spying on America for Israel, and actively campaigns to give American tax dollars to Israel. This is just one of many Israel lobbies in America. Are most Jews more loyal to Israel? Probably not, but since some Jews readily admit that they are, and when the lobbying gets taken into consideration, then it no longer becomes anti-Semitic to answer this question in the affirmative.
Other questions include: “Do Jews have too much power in the US” and “Do Jews have too much influence on Wall Street?” Well, just as Jewish activists would rail against discriminatory and inequitable practices if 2% of the white gentile population held the most important financial positions in the land, so too can gentile activists discuss Jewish overrepresentation. In fact, many Jews were prominent in the civil rights movement, which openly challenged white overrepresentation.
Jewish leaders have proven that they can no longer be trusted to unilaterally determine nor define anti-Semitism. As the Jewish publication Daily Beast wrote,
“I think it is time to acknowledge, bluntly, that certain major Jewish organizations, indeed, the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations—also, the ADL, AIPAC, the American Jewish Committee, political groups like the Republican Jewish Coalition, along with their various columnists, pundits, and list-serves—are among the most consistent purveyors of McCarthyite-style outrages in America today. Are there greater serial defamers of public officials in fake campaigns against defamation?”
Common sense needs to be brought into the discussion before more Americans are falsely accused and destroyed for their free speech. When matters of prospective or truthful statements can be seen as anti-Semitic, and punished severely, then citizens have no free speech.
When one considers that Jewish Americans are statistically the most significant and powerful force in American politics and foreign policy, not being able to discuss their role is tantamount to not being able to discuss politics at all.Now WHAT EXACTLY IS A SEMITE?????? GET SCHOOLED BEFORE CALLING TRUTH anti-Semitic!!!!!!
Semites are the descendants of Shem and the only way you can make it mean something else is by concocting your own biases and trying to make it so by repeating them over and over and drinking the proverbial Kool-Aid.By calling this post and me “anti-Semitic” YOU show your own “biases and ignorance”. If you say JEWS are descendants of Shem, then PROVE they are “descendants” of SHEM.
The word Semite comes from Noah's son Shem. Those who call themselves "Jews" assert that THEY are descendants of Shem. The Jews only “become” descendants when CHRISTIANS toss around verbiage of anti-Semitism when they are EXPOSED for being NOT OF ISRAEL and having landed in our BRANCHES of Government and all the HIGH SEATS today in like manner as they did IN JESUS’S TIME in the seats of The Sadducees, and The Pharisees THEN. Did Christ NOT say PUBLICALLY “YOU are OF your father the Devil and the DEEDS of your father you do? John 8:44. THESE SAME ILK have been EXPULSED from country after country for THEIR TRYING TO CONTROL . Look at OUR NATION TODAY.
Not all of Shem's descendants became Israelites, in fact the over whelming percent of Shem's descendants are NOT Israelites. Furthermore most of the descendants of Shem became the enemies who fought against the Israelites. Only a tiny fraction of Abraham's descendants became Israelites. Abraham had 10 sons with 3 wives (Sarah, Hagar and Keturah). Abraham has about 30 grandsons (all descendants of Shem and Eber) and only 1/30th was the father of the Israelites. All the rest of the Hebrew / Semitic grandchildren produced non Israelite descendants.
Anti-Semitism'—that's a 'dirty' word today. Anyone who indulges in it is a terrible person! It's a word to stop all criticism of a certain group. One must never be 'Anti-Semitic.' One can talk about a variety of subjects, in fact all subjects, but one must never talk against the 'Semites,' whoever they are! But here is a strange thing—no one really knows what 'Anti-Semitism' is. Do you know? Well, let us look at the word.
There is not much doubt about the word 'Anti.' It means "opposed to" or "against." One could be 'Anti-pornography,' which means that one is against pornography, and one could be 'Anti-abortion,' which means that one is against abortion. 'Anti-America' means to be against the country of America. Thus we can all agree that 'Anti' means 'against' but 'Semitism' is a different matter so let us examine it.
The word 'Semitism' comes from the name of a character in the Bible, whose name was Shem. If you will remember, Noah had three sons who were named Ham, Shem and Japheth. Those that came from Ham were called 'Hamites,' those that came from Shem were called 'Shemites,' or 'Semites,' and those descended from Japheth were called 'Japhethites.' Therefore anyone who is against the descendants of Shem, would be 'Anti-Semite.' Is that so? Well, let us follow it out a little further.
A great-grandson of Shem was named Eber or Heber, (see Genesis 11:14). Heber had descendants who were called 'Hebrews,' and his most notable descendant was a man named Abram, who was called a 'Hebrew' (see Genesis 14:13). The descendants of Abram (or Abraham, as he was later renamed) were called Hebrews, especially when the Children of Israel were in Egypt, and the Egyptians called them by that name, 'Hebrews.' Remember, all the descendants of Abraham were, and are, Hebrews.
Abraham had two sons (not counting those of Keturah). The firstborn son was named Ishmael, his mother was Hagar, an Egyptian. Because Ishmael was the son of Abraham's concubine, he was not given the blessings which were promised to Abraham, but was to head up a different race of people, namely the Arabs of today. Thus the Arabs are also a Semitic people because they came from Shem, the Son of Noah. As the Arabs are Semitic, then it follows that anyone who is against the Arabs would seem to be 'Anti-Semitic.'
So from this deduction and definition, if the Jews today are fighting the Arabs, the Jews are 'Anti-Semitic,' because the Arabs are Semites. Abraham's other son was Isaac, which meant Isaac was also a Hebrew, because Abraham was a Hebrew as well as a Semite, because he was descended from Shem. Therefore all the descendants of Isaac would be Hebrews and Semites.
Isaac had twin sons, one was named Esau, and the other Jacob. Like their father, they were both Hebrews and Semites, as would be all of their descendants. Later Esau's name was changed to Edom (means "Red"). Isaac's other son was named Jacob, which means a "supplanter," because when the twins were born, Jacob grabbed his brother's heel and tried to be born first. When Jacob grew up and took wives, he had twelve sons. After an experience with the Lord, Jacob's name was changed to Israel, and the descendants of his twelve sons were called, the "Children of Israel." Because Jacob was their father, these twelve sons were Israelites as well as Semites. Thus today, wherever the descendants of these twelve sons are, they are Hebrew, Semites and Israelites.
It happened that the twelve sons of Jacob-Israel developed into a strong kingdom, which at one time was ruled over by King Solomon. However, after his death the kingdom was divided into the ten-tribed, "House of Israel," and the two-tribed (Judah and Benjamin) "House of Judah." In 721 B.C., the House of Israel with many (around 250,000) from the House of Judah were carried into Assyrian captivity. In 586 B.C. the balance of Judah, with Benjamin, were taken into Babylonian captivity by King Nebuchadnezzer. After a period of 70 years, certain of the House of Judah returned to the "Land" under Ezra and Nehemiah and were from then on known as 'Jews' (the more correct term should be 'Judeans' as the noun 'Jew' did not exist at that time in history. Etymology of the word Jew: Middle English, from Old French gyu, from Latin Judaeus, from Greek Ioudaios, from Hebrew Yehudhi, fromYehudhah—Judah.—Merriam Webster Dictionary). At this point in time, in disobedience to the commandments of God, who forbade mixed marriages, they intermarried with the 'people of the land,' who were Edomites, Hittites, Canaanites, and so on. This caused Ezra great distress, and he called upon them to repent (see Ezra 9:1-2).
These 'Jews' that came back from Babylon not only had intermixed with the 'people of the land,' but also brought back the religion of Babylon with them, which is contained in the "Babylonian Talmud." These were called the 'traditions' and were the accumulated writings of the rabbis and other Jewish leaders. It was these 'Jews' that were in the land when Jesus came, and they disputed with Him on spiritual and moral questions. Ethnically they were part "Israel" and partly "Esau" because of their intermarriages. In Jesus' time, the ruler was Herod and he was an Edomite, being descended from Esau. Esau had intermarried with the Canaanites, and so these "Jews" were in reality a 'mixed race.' Also, in the time of Esther, "Many people of the land [Persia] became Jews, for fear of the Jews"! (See Esther 8:17).
Those of the Tribe of Benjamin that accompanied Judah, settled in Galilee, and became known as the Galileans. They were both Israelites and Hebrews, as well as being Semites. At a later date when Jerusalem was besieged, they escaped, wandered across Europe, and some became known as the "Normans," who finally entered into the British Isles in A.D. 1066 at the Battle of Hastings. The Normans, therefore, are Semitic, Hebrews, and are lost Israelites!
The Jews rejected Jesus as the Messiah or Christ (a transliteration—an adjective, not a noun), and were scattered after the fall of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, wandering from one country to another, many times being driven out of countries due to their way of life, and their attempts to control the countries. As the Arabs have opposed the Jews, the Arabs could not be classed as 'Anti-Semitic' because the Jews are Semites; instead they could be called "Anti-Jewish," because they are against the Jews. They are not against all of the other descendants of Shem!
The Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and kindred people that are the descendants of the 'lost Tribes of Israel,' could not be called 'Anti-Semitic,' because they are Semites, through Abraham, Isaac, Jacob-Israel and their descendants. Remember, the Arabs and kindred people are Semitic; the people of Northern Europe who are Celtic, Anglo-Saxons or kindred people are Semites; the founding fathers of the United states, and the Caucasian people of that nation are Semitic, and therefore cannot be accused of being 'Anti-Semitic.'
Those opposed to the 'Jews' should be called 'Anti-Jewish,' not 'Anti-Semitic.'
After being driven out of Asia, the Khazars, a Turko-Mongolian people settled north of the Caspian Sea. Having a spoken language, but not a written one and no religion, in A.D. 740, the Khazars adopted the Jewish religion. These Khazars were the descendants of Japheth, the son of Noah, from their ancestor Ashkenaz, who was a grandson of Japheth (see Genesis 10:1-3). The Khazars were later to be known as 'Ashkenazim Jews,' and subsequently settled in places such as Poland and Western Russia. They adopted the Hebrew characters for their language which is known today as 'Yiddish.' (Arthur) Koestler, a Jewish historian, tells in his book The Thirteenth Tribe, about the Khazars becoming Jews. Nowhere does he state that the Ashkenazim Jews are descendants of Israel. The Jews today, who protest the loudest about 'Anti-Semitism,' are not even Semites themselves, but are Japhethites. Today, about 90 per cent of the Jews are in reality 'Ashkenazim (Khazar) Jews,' and many of the people who make up the nation of 'Israel(i)' are really the Ashkenazim-Khazar Jews! The people who are being accused of 'Anti-Semitism,' like the Arabs, and some of the Celto-Anglo-Saxon-Israel people are the real 'Semites.'
Very few of the present day Jews follow the Old Testament teachings, but rather, follow the Babylonian Talmud instead. 'Anti-Semitism' is the cry that Jews raise today in order to stop people from investigating the Jewish incursion into the affairs of nations. Let us be clear about the meaning of the words we use. Truth helps to bring understanding and reconciliation between honest people and people of good faith.
No comments:
Post a Comment